e, that was a bug. Now it's fixed.
> You'll have to edit your tag to coerce the string to an integer. Not
> to hard to do, but a good idea even if it's not necessary.
You're right. I've already improved this code to be bulletproof and
safe.
--
eXt
--~--~-~--
Hi!
As apollo13 has suggested to me on #django I'm reporting here a
problem I've ecountered. Revision 10118 of Django has introduced some
changes to the way template filters work. I've simple filter:
@register.filter
@stringfilter
def truncatestring(src, ln):
ret = src[:ln]
if len(src
On 8 Lis, 12:54, "Alexander Solovyov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2007 1:46 PM, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > See if this is of any help:
> >http://www.amitu.com/blog/2007/july/django-extending-user-model/
I have used a method called "lost theories solution" in the po
On 28 Wrz, 22:35, "Deryck Hodge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrr... I see your point about each, at least as a use case. I
> think there are ways to get what you want without, though.
I see that I can define a model called GlobalPermissions and set my
custom permissions on it.
> For case #1
Hi!
Custom content types without a model give me a lot of flexibility.
For example:
1. I've got a bunch of reports which are generated by Jasper Reports.
In my Django app I have some groups of users and each of them should
see a different subset of reports. Reports are not defined in my
datab
Hi all!
I've a need to use some custom permissions in my applications. In
order to do that I used this snippet:
- http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/334/
It creates custom contenttype and sets custom permissions on it. So
far so good.
Yesterday I moved to the latest Django vers
