Re: Think about urlconf again

2006-04-04 Thread binaryfeed
This has been solved in Aquarium. http://aquarium.sf.net/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubs

Re: magic-removal: plans/estimates for the trunk-merge?

2006-03-28 Thread binaryfeed
These kinds of answers only serve to alienate people. Non-committal order-of-magnitude estimates can be very helpful, but apparently you disagree. That's your perogative, I suppose. It *is* your project. But it sure would be more friendly to say something like, "I can't promise everything, but

Re: magic-removal: plans/estimates for the trunk-merge?

2006-03-28 Thread binaryfeed
These kinds of answers only serve to alienate people. Non-committal order-of-magnitude estimates can be very helpful, but apparently you disagree. That's your perogative, I suppose. It *is* your project. But it sure would be more friendly to say something like, "I can't promise everything, but

Re: magic-removal: plans/estimates for the trunk-merge?

2006-03-27 Thread binaryfeed
gabor wrote: > is there a plan or a rough estimate about when the magic-removal branch > is going to be merged back to the trunk? > > this month? > next year? What's most frustrating about this thread is that no one has responded, really. I mean, it'd be great to know if it was going to be a mat