quot;-like interfaces instead?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Chris Foresman wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 10:25:02 AM UTC-6, Thomas Leo wrote:
>>
>> I've opened a ticket [1] to implement the popups in the admin as modal
>>> instead
>>
>
> I've opened a ticket [1] to implement the popups in the admin as modal
> instead
> of windows. I'm no UI/UX expert but modals are more or less the standard
> today,
> windows looks like a relic from the 2000s.
If it ain't broke don't fix it. The django admin is awesome, the reason it
ha
The new Design looks great! Awesome job!
One thing I really like about https://docs.python.org/3/ is the ability to
show/hide the side bar. The new design features a very large sidebar, being
able to toggle it would be awesome.
Also as previously mentioned trac doesn't look right yet.
On Tues
+1 for @Wim Feijen's rewording but...
I think the wording of the Group description isn't the issue, my guess is
that people who make the mistake of asking django-user's questions in the
django-developers mailing list didn't read the description to begin with.
> They are almost all from people who
+1 for django-contributors
django-contributors is clearer than django developers. When companies are
hiring web developers, they will often title the position "django
developer". Usually these companies are not looking for people who
"contribute" to the framework, but use the framework to deve
Keep up the great work!
On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 6:13:21 PM UTC-4, James Bennett wrote:
>
> Django 1.7 is now available:
>
> https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2014/sep/02/release-17-final/
>
> Alongside this are bugfix releases for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. The bugfix 1.5
> release is the final r
The company I'm currently contracting for, makes heavy use of formtools,
I'd be disappointed to see it go.
On Monday, May 26, 2014 6:04:31 PM UTC-4, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> My observation is that not many core developers seem interested in
> contrib.formtools these days. It was added by Adrian in
Their is some value in commenting directly on a pull-request, for example
you can comment on specific lines of code, and the interface is very
friendly.
With that being said, having a link to related google group pages (or
another mail-archive site) in the pull-request message would be a great
