Re: Schema Evolution branch?

2007-01-16 Thread Steve Hutton
On 2007-01-17, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > No apologies necessary. I've spent some time in Germany, so I > understand the uniquely German approach to directness ;-) > Unfortunately, it has been my experience that this doesn't always > translate well - I just wanted to make it clear (particular

Re: Should Django be HTML agnostic?

2007-01-13 Thread Steve Hutton
On 2007-01-11, Rob Hudson wrote: > > 2. The argument against #1 that I've seen is usually that you can > subclass Something and write your own output. But in some ways, this > violates the DRY principle. The code to output a form widget, for > example, is already written, and in looking at what i

Re: Schema Evolution branch?

2006-12-28 Thread Steve Hutton
On 2006-12-28, David Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > I've been hacking on my application for a bit now, and I'm at the > point where I'd want to be able to evolve my schema, rather than blow > away the data or futz around with SQL to upgrade stuff. So I took a > look at the s

schema-evolution branch - docs and status?

2006-12-09 Thread Steve Hutton
Hi, where can I find user and developer docs describing the schema evolution suport? Any status update? Still awaiting user feedback? The code browser seems to indicate features from the trunk aren't getting backported into this branch... http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/branches/sch