Re: Django t-shirt

2023-01-15 Thread Stephen Wolff
s.com/It’s linked from the fundraising page: https://www.djangoproject.com/fundraising/I have a Django phone case from there!On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:44 AM Stephen Wolff <stephen.wo...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi there,A few Django versions ago (1.7 and maybe 1.8?!), t-shirts were produced and s

Django t-shirt

2023-01-13 Thread Stephen Wolff
Hi there, A few Django versions ago (1.7 and maybe 1.8?!), t-shirts were produced and sold (i guess for fundraising purposes?). Just wondering given the forthcoming LTS is 4.2, which has similarities to Douglas Adams's answer to the life, universe and everything, whether a new t-shirt could be

Re: A prompt 1.2.3 release

2010-09-13 Thread Stephen Wolff
Hi Eric, Does this mean that the account we set up on our server is no longer necessary? Stephen On 11 Sep 2010, at 01:09, Eric Holscher wrote: There was a hudson server running IIRC, but http://hudson.djangoproject.com/ is not responding to me. I took the hudson instance down because n

Re: a new template algorithm

2010-08-31 Thread Stephen Wolff
Yep, and encourage new people to the list to actively contribute! One thing springs to mind, an agile / crystal process 'game', which encourages all parties to contribute ideas within a time frame (usually half an hour to a hour), without prejudice or discouragement. This gets lots of good

Re: Global name 'table' not defined

2010-08-30 Thread Stephen Wolff
The only time i've seen this sort of thing happening was when i had an app name that got in the way of something in the core/python namespace ('collections'). Do you have any apps that could be getting in the way? Does the error occur with all your projects? Stephen On 30 Aug 2010, at 17:3

Re: Trac workflow assistance (commiter feedback needed)

2010-04-24 Thread Stephen Wolff
5-10: The most useful of the lot for me personally. An automated process that applies patches and runs tests would be nice; if it can autocheck the appropriate flags ("patch needs improvement", "needs tests" etc) that would be even better. I recognize running tests w/ regressions pass wou

Re: High Level Discussion about the Future of Django

2010-04-17 Thread Stephen Wolff
I feel quite sad reading this thread. Good luck completing 1.2. I only wish I had time and energy to contribute. I suggest the core team ignore the thread for now if at all possible. On 17 Apr 2010 14:47, "Russell Keith-Magee" wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, George Sakkis wrote: > On Ap

Re: Django's testing infrastructure

2010-02-26 Thread Stephen Wolff
btw - Simon and I work together - so the identical specs were actually one machine... anyhow, we're really pleased to be involved, and to see how this all goes. We've been toying with CI for a while - including trying out the Trac Bitten plugin (http://bitten.edgewall.org/) - which could be ano

Re: Django's testing infrastructure

2010-02-26 Thread Stephen Wolff
We'd like to offer a CentOS 5 machine with Python 2.6 / MySQL 5.0 (InnoDB and MyISAM) for testing (with Lighttpd 1.4.23 - if that is used in any tests). We'll try and set it up over the next week. Stephen On 26/02/2010 06:56, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Eric H

Re: 404 debug pages should show the name of the tried urlpattern - #9310

2010-02-25 Thread Stephen Wolff
On 25/02/2010 20:05, SmileyChris wrote: Just two small points I'd like to highlight: On Feb 26, 3:50 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: I'm not casting blame here. Those doing triage work are doing a great job. I'm just pointing out that we have a problem. Despite the best efforts of our volun

Re: Proposal: Tutorial Refresh

2009-10-10 Thread Stephen Wolff
> The tutorial is extremely important. It will be the first part of the > docs read by 98% of new users. Don't complicate it by tying it to > DjangoCon. This thread has already seen requests for features that > will be great for real use, but would probably be too much to put into > a tuto

Re: FastCGI + Lighttpd documentation

2009-09-29 Thread Stephen Wolff
Jyrki Pulliainen wrote: > Hi, > > is there a particular reason why Lighttpd documentation advices user > to create a separate script (for example, an init script) to create > the socket with manage.py? Why not let the Lighttpd take care of > spawning processes as needed? > > If no-one is against i