Ticket 2713 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2713) was closed but
the proposed solution didn't fix the problem (it seems to me that it
was closed without being tested), so I submitted and tested a patch
that fixes it. Can someone look at this three-year old bug? I'm
surprised it hasn't bitten
No, I don't want to use a paginator. I don't even display the results,
I just process them. I was weighing in in favor of turning iterator()
into an actual iterator that fetches a few results at a time, as per
the discussion at hand.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rece
I'm developing an app that takes about 3m rows from the DB, and
currently everything is loaded in memory. This is unacceptable, since
the script rapidly uses up all the memory available in the machine and
stops responding. It would be good if django could return an actual
iterator, so we could wor
