On Apr 20, 8:02 pm, Carl Meyer wrote:#
> Feel free to hit me up on
> IRC (carljm) or here if you have questions working on the patch. I made
> some additional comments on the ticket. Thanks!
Thanks for checking over the ticket so quickly! I'm going to take up
your offer for help (or anyone for t
Today I discovered behavior similar to that originally reported in
#15819 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15819). I've updated it
with a simple way to reproduce the issue. Could anyone confirm this
behavior? It's nothing major but it does seem that the admin search
behavior changed from 1.2.5
Correction: "Surely this would be much slower but for situations where
write's are very [IN]frequent it's okay to pay."
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
ls/fields/related.py
On Dec 4, 3:21 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Ryan K wrote:
> > Sorry for the confusion but I sent the original link from my mobile
> > handset which isn't great for copying/pasting/etc.
>
> In future, could I please ask y
isunderstanding!).
Cheers,
Ryan
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/82d5fb7694dc9c5e/350c941c5f81a22a
[2]
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/afe6ad7994d868ba
In Ticket 5390 there are a few patches attached to it
On Dec 3, 9:37
This message is in regards to the patch on Ticket 5390 (http://
code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5390). I know that the period for
changes is closed but why shouldn't the current API just work. It
seems like a special case is being treated very differently but since
there relation is already implied i
is discussion is "findable" by Google Group's search.
Cheers,
Ryan
On Sep 10, 1:03 pm, Ryan K wrote:
> Thank you Waylan for your comments. I've found the developer
> discussion about this (searching the group for "auto_now_add" does not
> find the result! w
;
>
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Ryan K wrote:
> > > I'm trying to give advice to people but I can't even figure it out
> > > myself (even though it works for me just fine -- so far?).
>
> > Last week, I ran into a problem using them becaus
I wrote an article here
http://www.ryankaskel.com/2009/09/09/model-development-tips-for-django-projects/
describing a useful case (or rather a useful set up for many potential
cases) using abstract base models that implements this:
# Abstract models used by various application specific models
f
I've just implemented the django.contrib.comments system for my site
which is actually a great package that doesn't seem to be used by many
people. Does anyone have any plans to update the system? Some basic
configuration stuff seems to be missing like the ability to configure
where the comment's
I've just implemented the django.contrib.comments system for my site
which is actually a great package that doesn't seem to be used by many
people. Does anyone have any plans to update the system? Some basic
configuration stuff seems to be missing like the ability to configure
where the comment's
11 matches
Mail list logo
