at 11:10:27 PM UTC+6, Rohit Jha wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is my proposal for GSoCon 2FA
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f-9hOYHZ9rzLH7UEzdPmVi1n4jQJ92gDwYpqef1ZYMk/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Feedback and criticism is highly app
Hi,
Here is my proposal for GSoCon 2FA
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f-9hOYHZ9rzLH7UEzdPmVi1n4jQJ92gDwYpqef1ZYMk/edit?usp=sharing
Feedback and criticism is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django develope
Adam Johnson wrote:
>
>> Hi Rohit!
>>
>> It seems your email thread has been missed by the list, I don't know why,
>> perhaps it hit some spam filters. There's also another thread from a
>> student proposing the same projectt:
>>
>>
>> h
Hi
I am Rohit Jha, I am a sophomore at IIT Roorkee. I am planning to
participate in GSOC. My draft Proposal can be found here :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jSEir_wuYlBqvQTmWJUF3mpquuIH4ElZG1hFBeMl1HI/edit?usp=sharing
Feedback is much appreciated
Thanks
--
You received this message
I want to create a interactive 3D model in my Django app. Few of the pages
will render 3D model which should be interactive and could be changed based
on the inputs. I have obj file right now. How to do this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Djang
I really liked the idea of more advanced inbuilt support for ajax in django . I
use django for my work and more than 80% of our time we use ajax. would really
like to participate and work on it .
thanks
On 22-Nov-2012, at 4:09 PM, James Pic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> More projects use AJAX nowadays.
(unique key in abstract model)
https://github.com/iamrohitbanga/django_ticket_19271/tree/code_not_working
Is it possible to support this feature in a future release?
Thanks
Rohit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Rohit wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I plan to implement HBase backend support for Django as part of
> > GSoC 2011. Before I flesh out the idea in detail,
Hi,
I plan to implement HBase backend support for Django as part of
GSoC 2011. Before I flesh out the idea in detail, I would like to know
if this is useful enough to Django, whether there are alternatives to
using HBase in the first place.
--
You received this message because you are subscr
To re-iterate, you would get this message iff you have the correct
credentials for an end user who is not an admin user. You seem to be
referring to Response Information Discrepancy Information Exposure
(http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/204.html) which is generally
about differentiating betwee
I personally like the idea of a decorator
On Mar 13, 12:30 pm, Ryan N wrote:
> I personally do not believe XFrameOptionsMiddleware should be on by
> default. There are plenty of folks using Django for simple static
> sites or RESTful APIs where clickjacking doesn't apply.
>
> I'd prefer it's some
This is awesome - very progressive and I hope other frameworks follow
suite.
Have you done a poll of users to see how many would be affected by a
"SAMEORIGIN" setting? Maybe that would be a good place to start. Is
there some other way to test the overall impact of this prior to
committing to it be
To summarize - if I understand correctly the only way a more specific
error message can result in a problem is the following scenario:
1) An attacker correctly guesses credentials for a user on the admin
site
2) The attacker does not try to authenticate with the same credentials
on the regular site
let users know
that brute-force prevention doesn't come out of the box. Does that
sound fair?
On Mar 8, 4:10 am, Michael Radziej wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:11:19 -0800 (PST), Rohit Sethi
> wrote:
> > Luke, I guess the real question is what's the risk of not including it
nough for their needs. Again,
please correct me if my assumptions here are wrong.
On Mar 7, 6:48 pm, Luke Plant wrote:
> On 04/03/11 21:56, Rohit Sethi wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I wanted to revisit a key security discussion. Brute force
> > attacks are the 7th most prev
end against every attack scenario, but if we can improve
> the most common areas, it will be a substantial gain.
>
> I'm quite interested in working to get better protection into core. I
> agree with Rohit that throttling/rate-limiting is going to be where
> Django finds a good b
Ok, we'll go ahead with researching this. Expect to hear back from us
within the next 2-3 weeks (if not this upcoming week)
Thanks,
Rohit
On Mar 5, 8:40 am, Rohit Sethi wrote:
> Hi Russell, here are my thoughts on your points:
>
> 1. I do believe there should be something enab
n Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Rohit Sethi wrote:
> > Hi all, I wanted to revisit a key security discussion. Brute force
> > attacks are the 7th most prevalent attack by number of incidents in
> > the Web Hacking Incidents Database (http://projects.webappsec.org/w/
> > page
Hi all, I wanted to revisit a key security discussion. Brute force
attacks are the 7th most prevalent attack by number of incidents in
the Web Hacking Incidents Database (http://projects.webappsec.org/w/
page/13246995/Web-Hacking-Incident-Database), which tracks publicly
disclosed breaches in web a
Hi Jacob, just as an FYI I messaged you last week about this off list
- my email was from my first name @securitycompass.com. Just wanted to
make sure you got it
Thanks,
Rohit
On Feb 24, 6:55 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi Rohit --
>
> I had a skim of the document, too, and my fee
pieces of it are way too complex to implement as part
of a core framework, and which ones are viable. Once we revise the
list we'll look at ways to better present the data rather than a huge
single doc.
Thanks!
Rohit
On Feb 21, 11:31 pm, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> I've got one bit of f
emented by every framework in the world - nor should it be.
So, we (myself and at least four of our developers) will be working
closely with the Django community. I will be watching the list closely
and providing feedback when I can.
Looking forward to working with you
Cheers,
Rohit
On Feb 21,
One more point - if any of you have questions for somebody who leaves
and breathes web application security every day, please feel free to
fire them off to me:
rohit at securitycompass.com
On Feb 21, 10:21 am, Rohit Sethi wrote:
> Django devs, I wanted to thank you for a truly awes
t
too.
Thanks in advance,
Rohit Sethi
@rksethi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-deve
24 matches
Mail list logo
