Re: ANN: Server upgrade on djangoproject.com

paste.com/371850/ Thanks -- Atenciosamente, Renato Garcia Pedigoni On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss > wrot

Re: GSoC - Class based serializers

sed on yours comments and tips: (check "Syntax" and "Describing the current Django model serialization" sections) https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AcnuqDbQa1rGZGMzdng3cW1fMTE2aHJtMzZkZnA&hl=pt_BR Thanks! -- Atenciosamente, Renato Garcia Pedigoni -- You received this message b

Re: GSoC - Class based serializers

e itself, or is it a generic placeholder for any > foreign key reference, which needs to be nested ( id='3'/>)? > Actually I'd like to "finish" my ideas on JSON and then focus on XML differences. I know have a really short time to finish my proposal and send to Google, but

Re: GSoC - Class based serializers

can create new generic reusable Template classes that will be auto serialized to JSON, YAML, XML... I couldn't find the implications of this approach, if possible give me a feedback please. Thanks, Renato On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10,

GSoC - Class based serializers

proving my proposal. If someone has moment and wants read (and if possible) discuss it here's my proposal: https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AcnuqDbQa1rGZGMzdng3cW1fMTE2aHJtMzZkZnA&hl=pt_BR Thanks a lot -- Atenciosamente, Renato Garcia Pedigoni -- You received this message because yo

Re: Non-trivial question: New subclass companion for Stacked/Tabular Inlines

g and upload a patch, it's much easier to discuss > > these things when there's something concrete on the table. > > > > Alex > > > > -- > > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death y

Re: [GSoC admin-ui] Focusing on inlines this week

t up to. > > Phil > > > > > -- Atenciosamente, Renato Garcia Pedigoni --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroup

Re: GSoC - denormalization model field proposal

rash/django-denorm/tree/master - where you just > write a function and stick a decorator around it to make it work. I'm > not sure if that's the right size of code for a GSoC project either, but > then I've not seen too many past entries in full. > > Andrew > > &

Re: GSoC - denormalization model field proposal

code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SummerOfCode2009 and after a talk with Jacob, he said it could be a "great project for GSoC". Just my thoughts, > Alex > Thank you, Alex. I'll think how to solve the problem you've spotted and try to implement it even out of GSoC. -- Atenciosa

GSoC - denormalization model field proposal

Hi folks, My name is Renato, 21, currently studying Biomedical Informatics at the University of São Paulo, Brazil. I'm submitting in the next week my proposal to GSoC, to create a denormalized model field, like discussed in http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/9a