Re: Magic removal stuff...

2005-12-17 Thread Patrick K. O'Brien
That shouldn't be too hard. We switched to 2.4 in order to use sets, but we should be able to toggle that for 2.3 support. -- Patrick K. O'Brien Orbtech http://www.orbtech.com Schevohttp://www.schevo.org Louie http://louie.berlios.de

Re: Magic removal stuff...

2005-12-17 Thread Patrick K. O'Brien
th classmethods, I had to wrap them in a lambda . > > Maybe the last bit here: > http://louie.berlios.de/louie/robustapply.py.html#25 should also check > if the argument is callable(), and if so wrap it in a lambda or something. Patches (with unit tests) would be greatly appreciated.

Re: Magic removal stuff...

2005-12-17 Thread Patrick K. O'Brien
I think using the egg mechanism is going to be much better than including Louie in your SVN repository, even using svn:external. We used to do that with Schevo but now rely exclusively on eggs and the result is much better, imo. -- Patrick K. O'Brien Orbtech http://www.orbtech.com S

Re: Magic removal stuff...

2005-12-17 Thread Patrick K. O'Brien
even further for projects that adopt it. So I would strongly encourage you to use Louie instead of pydispatcher. You can find it here: http://louie.berlios.de/ -- Patrick K. O'Brien Orbtech http://www.orbtech.com Schevohttp://www.schevo.org Louie http://louie.berlios.de

Re: save/delete/etc hooks for custom fields

2005-12-01 Thread Patrick K. O'Brien
c > implementation is a post 1.0 debate I think. You might also want to take a look at Louie, a new derivative of PyDispatcher: http://louie.berlios.de/ -- Patrick K. O'Brien Orbtech http://www.orbtech.com Schevohttp://www.schevo.org