Re: Patch: ENTERPRISE_TRANS_MANAGER = True

2006-07-07 Thread OpenMercury
> > Either way, I'll take a look at your patch. > > Jacob It's up there. I tried to assign to you. # 2304 [patch]... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this gr

Re: Patch: ENTERPRISE_TRANS_MANAGER = True

2006-07-07 Thread OpenMercury
> I'd say if DISABLE_TRANSACTION_MANAGEMENT doesn't actually disable > transaction management that we should call that a bug and fix it > instead of introducing a > REALLY_DISABLE_TRANSACTION_MANAGEMENT_NO_I_MEAN_IT_THIS_TIME setting. > > Jacob I hear you. I looked through the repository yesterd

Re: Patch: ENTERPRISE_TRANS_MANAGER = True

2006-07-07 Thread OpenMercury
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Jul 7, 2006, at 9:45 AM, OpenMercury wrote: > > I'm proposing and have created a Patch that is incorporated into the > > settings.py and global_settings.py files called: > > ENTERPRISE_TRANS_MANAGER = True. > > H

Patch: ENTERPRISE_TRANS_MANAGER = True

2006-07-07 Thread OpenMercury
Sorry to go into a long winded disertation here.. The organization I'm currently working for has started to Use Django for limmited functionality. Mainly the ORM to integrate our Postgres DB with some XML Processing. While doing our Unit testing, I figured out that we could not do proper commit/