Re: Bizarre behaviour using django.test.client.Client.put

I should clarify, this is only an issue when wanting to put data *both* in the query string and the request body. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/dja

Bizarre behaviour using django.test.client.Client.put

Hi, I don't really know if what I'm posting is expected behaviour or not (hence not going straight to Trac), but I am seeing very odd behaviour using django.test.client.Client.put. The documentation describest

Re: GSoC Proposal: Serialization Enhancements

at might otherwise be difficult to unearth. > > Russ > > > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Oliver Beattie wrote: > > > I'll admit that I haven't read your whole post (sorry), but one part > > caught my eye… the bit about storing relationships not just as

Re: Signals sent by the cache framework?

> There should be no monkey-patching involved. Using a separate settings > file for tests so that it points to its own cache isn't monkey patching > -- it's normal practice. Tests don't run in production environments, so > some settings have to be changed. I do have separate settings for all the

Re: Signals sent by the cache framework?

I figured that might be the case. I am wrapping the backend now in tests, I just hate monkey patching :) Anyway, thanks for answering, I'm glad it got a definite response. On Mar 30, 1:01 am, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 16:28 -0700, Oliver Beattie wrote: > >

Signals sent by the cache framework?

Hey Everyone, I just wanted to poll opinion on a feature request I'm considering posting a ticket for (and obviously write a patch for). Basically, I want the cache framework to send signals whenever it interacts with the cache (things like cache_hit, cache_miss, cache_set, cache_deleted). I kno

Re: GSoC Proposal: Serialization Enhancements

I'll admit that I haven't read your whole post (sorry), but one part caught my eye… the bit about storing relationships not just as primary keys. If I am right in thinking that you are wanting to do some sort of "relationship following" I think I can probably help by providing some initial (but a