Re: Switching to PEP 621 project metadata

Okay then! Just 2 questions before I go: > I'd much rather let the bulk of smaller projects adopt, and iron out the details, and then update when it's a better beaten track. Can we please quantify such heuristics? I want something concrete to write in my OSS to-do list :) > I am referring to t

Re: Switching to PEP 621 project metadata

d in widespread use. On Sunday, July 24, 2022 at 3:41:37 PM UTC-4 James Bennett wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:06 AM Ofek Lev wrote: > >> Hello! This is about using only `pyproject.toml` for packaging >> https://github.com/django/django/pull/15874 > > > My initia

Switching to PEP 621 project metadata

Hello! This is about using only `pyproject.toml` for packaging https://github.com/django/django/pull/15874 The main question I think as Nick asked is whether it's okay to remove support for `python setup.py bdist_rpm`. As I mention in the OP: 1. Fedora does not use that