Re: Fwd: how are you handling i18n and m10l content?

2006-11-09 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
* David Blewett wrote, On 09.11.2006 14:14: > What about using generic relations for this? You could have something > like this: > class I18NText(models.Model): > language = models.ForeignKey(Language) > field = models.CharField(maxlength=25) > translated_text = models.TextField() >

Re: Should we have another 'post_save' signal?

2006-11-06 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
* medhat wrote, On 01.11.2006 00:13: > Hi, > I was trying to create a thumbnail from an ImageField when the object > is saved. I tried different things but none of them worked the way I > wanted. Then I thought of using the post_save signal to do it only to > discover that this signal is sent aft

Re: Model inheritance API

2006-07-24 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > Rather than watch the "inherit from User" thread go round and round, > maybe I should give people something more concrete to think about. > > This is a follow-up to the mail I sent late on Friday. It describes the > area where we need API additions or some kind of semi

RFC: Localization (L10N)

2006-07-24 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
sorry for cross post. I just want to bring some attention to this thread http://groups.google.com/group/Django-I18N/browse_thread/thread/f33c087fc57fb2bc/44aecc7ee75f676f#44aecc7ee75f676f We currently have great i18n implementation, but not l10n - yes, we have date-aware template filters/tags b

Re: Table options in CREATE TABLE..

2006-07-18 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
DavidA wrote: > improve it a bit: > > 1) In addition to providing initial data in a file > /sql/.sql, I think it would be good to support a > form of /sql//.sql so if you want to put > DB-specific stuff in there you can. That way if I moved my app to > PostgreSQL, for example, it wouldn't try to

Re: Translation problem when not logged in

2006-07-13 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Gribbie wrote: > Soory - that should read "...when I got to the next screen the selected > language is lost and so the page is in English" Check your settings.py: MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES = ( "django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware", "django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware",

Re: Translation problem when not logged in

2006-07-12 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Gribbie wrote: > I've got a click the flag on the welcome screen - when they 1st load > the page it is in english - it uses the last 2 lines of the method: > > request.session['django_language']='en-uk' > return render_to_response('welcome.html', {'request':request, > 'user':request.u

Re: Translation problem when not logged in

2006-07-12 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Gribbie wrote: > Hi Nebojsa > > Thanks for your reply - we are using django internationalisation. It > all works fine when logged in it's just the introduction pages before > the user logs in where we have the problem. Well, if django i18n engine can't find out proffered locale from the browse

Re: Translation problem when not logged in

2006-07-12 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Gribbie wrote: > Hi > > I have an application which when the user is logged in translates > using: > request.session['django_language']='en-uk' or what ever language > code they select. > > This works fine when the user is logged in but I'd like to offer the > user the option to translate th

Re: A problem of js option of Admin options

2006-04-18 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
huangyi wrote: > class Admin: > js = [url,] > > django always translate url to 'admin_media/'+url > > I think > > if url.startswith('http://'): > url > else: > 'media/'+url > > is better. > > OR always translate url to 'custom_media/'+url , > > because this *IS* custom j

Re: Removing TEMPLATE_FILE_EXTENSION

2006-04-14 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > What do you think of the idea (proposed by Luke Plant here: > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/500 ) to remove the > TEMPLATE_FILE_EXTENSION setting, so that you'd have to specify ".html" > in each get_template() call? > > I like it, because it solves the problem of w

magic-removal: 'AddManipulator' object has no attribute 'isUniquecontent_object_id_field'

2006-04-12 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
(latest MR) I suspect that this have something to do with related field which have unique_together and edit_inline=True set. You can see example with my translation model from http://djangoutils.python-hosting.com/file/trunk/nesh/translation/models.py (Message and Registry models). If I try to

Re: has broken something ?

2006-04-12 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Gael Chardon wrote: > hum I'm wrong .. seems to be more complicated than this "import fix" > > I'm trying to find why my model does not work after this couple of > updates... > There are more missing imports see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1623 -- Nebojša Đorđević - nesh Studio Quatt

Re: Connections not being closed in m-r

2006-04-05 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Luke Plant wrote: > On Wednesday 05 April 2006 00:31, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > >> If that fixes the problem, go ahead and commit it -- it doesn't seem >> like the type of change that would cause problems. Thanks for >> catching this! > > OK, I've committed, and it seems to work fine. I've found

Re: How to create related table from field

2006-04-03 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
akaihola wrote: >> If I understood docs correctly this is now possible in m-r branch. > > Sounds interesting! Which part of the docs? Ops, my error, no docs. Sorry for misleading post :( I mostly got this from M2M field usage, and with all the talk of "removing the magic" I presumed that I

Re: [magic-removal] How to create related table from field

2006-03-31 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
nesh wrote: > I'm trying to create i18n aware Char and Text fields for m-r branch but I > can't figure out how to create additional > tables from field definition (something like M2M field does). > > Basically I need something like this: > > class Foo(models.Model): > bar = I18NCharField(

Re: magic-removal: model validate() question(s)

2006-03-31 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > That's pretty much it. Let me know if you decide to take this on...We > should coordinate which fields we're taking. I'm attached new unit-tests and the first version of the patch to the ticket (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1553). Take a look. Not implemented:

Re: magic-removal: model validate() question(s)

2006-03-30 Thread Nebojsa Djordjevic
Nebojša Đorđević wrote: > I giving it a try, see ticket http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1553 for > details. For start I attached unit-tests for field classes to the ticket. -- Nebojša Đorđević - nesh Studio Quattro - Niš - SCG http://studioquattro.biz/ http://djnesh.blogspot.com/ | http