dvertised. This is largely the
impetus for starting the django-deployer project, to try to streamline this
process for those new to PaaS and Django deployment.
Nate
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Nate Aune
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Russell and Florian,
>>
>> A bit late t
;s
current state of infancy:
http://appsembler.com/blog/deploy-django-apps-to-google-app-engine-with-django-deployer-in-5-minutes/
http://appsembler.com/blog/deploy-django-apps-to-dotcloud-with-django-deployer-in-5-minutes/
> However, I think the only way it could happen would be if Nate want
deployment talks at meetups around the country,
it's fairly evident that deployment is and continues to be a hot topic, one
that is often a stumbling block for people new to Django. I think Django
would benefit greatly from tools such as django-deployer that minimize the
friction, and giv
it's a couple weeks old, in case you missed my original email, I've
included it below.
Thanks,
Nate
___
> From: django-developers@googlegroups.com [
> django-developers@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Bragg [
> jonathan.br...@alum.rp
authors__required = False
confidential__widget = AdminYesNoWidget
uploader__required = False
file__widget = AdminFileWidgetWithSize
... and I don't like *that* particularly either.
Cheers,
Nate
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've added
nce; using djangobench, I measured
somewhere between a 3% and 8% increase in runtime.
* I don't have enough tests - mostly for a lack of creativity. What kind of
composed aggregates and expressions would you like to see? I'll add
tests for them.
Thank you all, and sorry for the above be
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Simone Federici wrote:
> oracle and postgresql have the similar performance during the tests,
>
> but mysql... there is some tricks to go faster the mysql suite test case?
>
I recently encountered this as well; for me, it was because I was using
MyISAM as the bac
ue for me.
If this issue is not a release blocker, or my patch is insufficient, please
let me know.
Regards,
Nate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googleg
After contributing the solution to a small problem (#17492), I was
inspired to look for other tickets that I would be able to help on,
either by triaging un-reviewed tickets (#17537, #17561, #17573),
supplying new patches (#14030*, #16735, #17186), or reviewing patches
(#11305, #16955, #17541)
*re
Hello. My name is Nate. Myself and my friend Marco would like to
upgrade django permissions. We would like to brainstorm here first to
make sure that we design something that fits with django.
If there are any other discussions about upgrading django permissions,
kindly point me to them. We have
If I'm not mistaken, this sort of lazy url reversing could make it
possible to reverse URLs in settings, which has effect upon issues
such as the following:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/fa3661888716f940
Is that correct?
On Jul 11, 11:02 am, Nowell Strite
.site.urls()))
> ('^admin2/', include(second_admin_site.urls()))
Is there going to be any facility for defining additional admin views
besides the current add, change, and delete?
Nate
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscrib
.
# This is pseudo-python
def find_admin_urlpatterns:
for app in settings.INSTALLED_APPS:
if app.admin:
urlpatterns += app.admin.urlpatterns
else:
for model in app.models:
if model.Admin:
urlpatterns += model.Admin.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 06:21:21PM -0600, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Nate Straz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What if the admin app was really an admin framework inside Django? It
> > could provide a base admin sub-app that applications could extend. That
&g
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:47:08PM -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On 1/23/07 9:16 PM, Nate Straz wrote:
> > Why does the admin app tie directly to models? Why not applications?
>
> Because sometimes you want certain models within in app *not* to be
> admin-editable.
Ok
Why does the admin app tie directly to models? Why not applications?
Nate
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-
y -> otherapps/models.py
>
> This is exactly what we need for our apps to be portable :)
Wow, I never knew about that syntax. I checked the Language Reference
all the way back to the 1.5 release and it is in every release. I'm
surprised I've never seen that syntax used befo
17 matches
Mail list logo
