gt; #21978 <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21978>).
>
> On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 12:43:19 AM UTC-4, Moayad Mardini wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The development server currently uses "non-daemon threads" for
>> the socketserver, this
Hi,
The development server currently uses "non-daemon threads" for
the socketserver, this has many bad side effects, as discussed in ticket
#21773 ( https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21773 ).
The most annoying disadvantages of that are:
1) Longer time to restart, because the sever has to mak
Sorry for the typo. I meant to say that I think option A is more Pythonic
than option B.
I personally like the approach Marc suggested, which is introducing another
URL resolver, rather than modifying the existing one.
Moayad
On 2 Jun 2014 12:36, "Alexandr Shurigin"
wrote:
> Hi! Thank you for r
Hi Alexandr,
Thanks for the nice suggestion. It's good to try to improve Django in an
area you think it might be lacking.
I also think this is a really nice feature to add to the framework, which
will make it more beginner-friendly.
I'll try to discuss what I think is the most important featur
