Re: Documentation restructuring

2008-01-19 Thread Mark Green
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 15:02 +0200, Nis Jørgensen wrote: > Kenneth Gonsalves skrev: > > one thing I would like to see is: table of contents available on all > > pages. Now I have to go to 'documentation' and click on dbiapi. Then, > > if I want to go to 'creating models' I go back to 'documen

Re: Django 1.0 features -- the definitive list

2007-11-30 Thread Mark Green
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 00:33 -0600, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > (I've been saving this e-mail since the last sprint. Given that we're > sprinting again this weekend, I figured it was about time to get this > conversation started.) > > Let's get a definitive list of features we want in Django 1.0, and

Re: ticket #5986, reviews welcome

2007-11-28 Thread Mark Green
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 03:39 -0800, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On 20 Lis, 16:15, "Michal Salaban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We have created a patch which allows customizing the order of Fields in > > Forms.http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5986 > > > > The initial idea (with

Re: i18n missing feature ... continued (proposed solution for the upcoming sprint)

2007-11-20 Thread Mark Green
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 19:11 +0100, Wolfram Kriesing wrote: > [...] > * Step 2, may be encapsulate the stuff you don't want the translators > to touch, the same way variables get used > {% blocktrans %} > Received on {{ message.created|date as date }} > from > {{ '' as link_open }

Re: i18n missing feature ... continued (proposed solution for the upcoming sprint)

2007-11-18 Thread Mark Green
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 11:38 +1100, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 00:22 +0100, Mark Green wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 02:01 -0800, alain D. wrote: > [...] > > > Your syntax is interesting but : > > > - I'm not sure

Re: i18n missing feature ... continued (proposed solution for the upcoming sprint)

2007-11-18 Thread Mark Green
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 02:01 -0800, alain D. wrote: > Hi, > > I agree that my proposed syntax was a little bit horrible ... but I > really wonder if it can be different. > > Your syntax is interesting but : > - I'm not sure it's really "djangoic" in the sense that it introduce > a new way t

Re: i18n missing feature ... continued (proposed solution for the upcoming sprint)

2007-11-18 Thread Mark Green
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 11:23 -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On 11/17/07, Mark Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > {% blocktrans with value|filter as number %} > > This will have [[]]one item[[]] inside > [...] > > I stopped reading here. Anything that involv

Re: i18n missing feature ... continued (proposed solution for the upcoming sprint)

2007-11-17 Thread Mark Green
Sorry, I made a (hopefully obvious) mistake in my example, see below: On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 04:33 +0100, Mark Green wrote: > --- > > Template: > > - > {% blocktrans with value|filter as number %} > This will have [[]]one item[[]] inside > {% plural %} > This wi

Re: i18n missing feature ... continued (proposed solution for the upcoming sprint)

2007-11-17 Thread Mark Green
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 02:11 -0800, alain D. wrote: > Hi, > >Following up on a previous discussion about an important but > complex i18n missing feature : > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/c88b582fa4764aaa > > I've been thinking over and over about