I don't understand why the TypeError needs to be caught at all. If the
wrong number of arguments are passed then it seems to me that something
is genuinely broken - is there some reason to mask it? FWIW I removed
that catch as part of #1400 and haven't missed it.
Kieran
--~--~-~--~---
On 3/14/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/13/06, Jonathan Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe implement generic support for /* .. */ in template tags?
> A definite no on that one -- it's too programmerish.
hugo wrote:
> >{% endif %}{# endif start_process #}
>
> Ug
Tom Tobin wrote:
> On 3/14/06, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Kieran Holland wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> {% endif %}{# endif start_process #}
> > >> I think that original idea is cleaner: {% endif start_process %}.
&
Eugene Lazutkin wrote:
> Kieran Holland wrote:
> >
> > I don't like the idea of arbitrary content in template tags either but
> > does your "definite no" also apply to this old idea:
> >
> > {% endif %}{# endif start_process #}
>
> I think
On 3/14/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On 3/13/06, Jonathan Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Maybe implement generic support for /* .. */ in template tags?
A definite no on that one -- it's too programmerish.
I don't like the idea of arbitrary content in template tags either b
On 08/09/05, mrelectron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> totally plus 1 with all of this, i would be more than happy to do the
> documention. the simple conventions and guidance which RoR gives for
> application and project architecture has helped a great deal in getting
> it accepted.
Cool. The exi
> On 04/09/05, Eugene Lazutkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Currently app's name should be unique within a project. I want to be
> > able
> > to reuse the same app several times. Example: categories. I may have
> > different categories for my blog, for my bookmarks, and for my articles.
Thanks for your ideas,
I hope that others - especially those with Ruby experience - may be
able to offer some informed solutions. In the case of points (1) and
(6) I wonder if the following would help:
On 04/09/05, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Currently app's name should be
