On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:39:51 AM UTC-4, Josh Smeaton wrote:
>
> Kevin,
>
> > It simply says, in deliberately vague language, that if a member of the
> Django community is treated abusively by another member of the Django
> community _outside_ a Django forum and that abuse is reporte
Benjamin (and all others still paying attention),
I love the Django code of conduct. It's not perfect but it's quite good.
How does a person who claims one or even many historically marginalized
identities know that the Django community is a safe place for them without
a published and enforced
ons I've already gone into great
>> detail about. I do believe completely that both were put forward with good
>> intentions. I'm all for policies that put forward good examples of
>> appreciated behav
t itself from people outside those groups is
> definitely welcome - the broader opinion and attitudes of the community
> will be considered as part of the ratification process. But it's not
> something that a small group of people can quickly agree on and commit.
>
> Russ %
oject.com/pull/86>, to make
explicit the currently implicit policy that someone's abusive behavior
outside the django community *may* have an adverse effect on their
ability to participate within the django community.
I welcome your feedback.
Thanks,
Kevin Daum
--
You rece
