On 8/30/06, GinTon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to know your opinions. Since of my view point I think that the
> web frameworks with ODBMS will be the next big step.
I prefer an RDBMS because I tend to integrate with other
projects/languages at the RDBMS level. The other advantage is tha
On 8/30/06, Robin Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now, I plan to use ActiveMapper -- why re-invent the wheel? I'd
> be happy to look at your code, though. I like "borrowing" from other
> people's work whenever I can, it means less work for me. :-) And
> that's what open-source development
On 8/22/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * More flexible mapping including:
> > - Mapping multiple objects to a table
> > - Mapping multiple tables to an object
> > - Mapping the results of an arbitrary query
> > - Selectively overriding join conditions (including both to and f
On 8/22/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I, for one, would appreciate some more specific criticism. For
> example, just saying that the Django ORM is "a far cry from what
> SQLAlchemy provides" is basically worthless as far as constructive
> criticism; what we need is examples of "he
On 8/11/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, we'd be open to making the admin app more extensible. Without
> more details, though, I'm not sure what to say. Do you have more
> specific ideas on how we could provide for extensibility of the admin
> app?
I'll admit that I haven't