Re: RDBMS vs ODBMS

2006-08-30 Thread Karl Guertin
On 8/30/06, GinTon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wanted to know your opinions. Since of my view point I think that the > web frameworks with ODBMS will be the next big step. I prefer an RDBMS because I tend to integrate with other projects/languages at the RDBMS level. The other advantage is tha

Re: Integrating Django and SQLAlchemy

2006-08-30 Thread Karl Guertin
On 8/30/06, Robin Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right now, I plan to use ActiveMapper -- why re-invent the wheel? I'd > be happy to look at your code, though. I like "borrowing" from other > people's work whenever I can, it means less work for me. :-) And > that's what open-source development

Re: Re: [Fw]The Python Web Framework

2006-08-22 Thread Karl Guertin
On 8/22/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * More flexible mapping including: > > - Mapping multiple objects to a table > > - Mapping multiple tables to an object > > - Mapping the results of an arbitrary query > > - Selectively overriding join conditions (including both to and f

Re: [Fw]The Python Web Framework

2006-08-22 Thread Karl Guertin
On 8/22/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I, for one, would appreciate some more specific criticism. For > example, just saying that the Django ORM is "a far cry from what > SQLAlchemy provides" is basically worthless as far as constructive > criticism; what we need is examples of "he

Re: Thoughts on extensibility of the admin app

2006-08-11 Thread Karl Guertin
On 8/11/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, we'd be open to making the admin app more extensible. Without > more details, though, I'm not sure what to say. Do you have more > specific ideas on how we could provide for extensibility of the admin > app? I'll admit that I haven't