I had offered my assistance a while ago, but I'm afraid that these
days I don't have it.
I do, however, have quite a bit of detail on setting up a buildbot
system and the various configuration/python script bits if anyone
wants them. I'd provided these to Matt, and would be more than happy
to hand
On 9/22/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Have we got any documentation pointing to the existence of the
> buildbot? I was thinking that it should be mentioned somewhere on the
> 'how to contribute' page.
>
> - The build last night ([6407]) should have passed, but the Postgres
We can certainly enable something like that, but I don't think we're
stable enough in our configuration to make that worthwhile at the
moment.
I'm also a little concerned that the noise level would be high for
those messages - that ultimately people would ignore them because of
frequency.
Maybe
Thanks!
Matt and I already know about the error - he's working on it, although
I don't know the timescale.
On 9/20/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/20/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now, should such problems reported on this list at all? Or is the mai
I know I'm just a lurker, but I'd really like to see a release with
the various bug fixes and such to match up to the documentation.
There's plenty I'd like to use, and yes - I'm one of the many that
reads one and wonders why things don't work that way. I do eventually
figure it out - and not open
Cobbling a script to run with different settings is probably the
easiest way. I have a buildbot environment on a virtual machine that I
have doing that sort of testing, but it's distributed out and probably
not what you want to copy. Deep under the covers, it relies on pulling
in explicit config f
I'd be very surprised if we had a release in the next three weeks with
this kind of support.
My guess is you might check the development trunk
(http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/db/backends/ado_mssql)
and try it out to see if it works acceptably for you needs.
I'm sure t
Out of curiousity, what's the reason to try and keep them separate
instead of just layering it over the session mechanism?
-joe
On 6/18/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's not difficult for someone to implement this themselves, but it
> does seem useful enough (imo) for core.
>
>
Good morning,
I have been looking at how to best provide a break-out of a few fields
in newforms to my template designers. In corresponding with Malcolm on
django-users, I found out that you couldn't break down the form input
into it's parts directly from within a template - primarily because
Bou
This is really the wrong list for this. Django-users would be more
appropriate, or better yet a list that's about subversion.
On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone point me to a good site for a quick-guide to subversion?
> We pretty much just do vanilla update/co
For the performance scaling estimate, what you critically need is a service
time. If you push static media to something light and fast (lighttpd), then
your slowest service time will typically be the application itself
(Apache+Mod_python or whatever you're using). You'll want to verify that,
but it
I've been working on enabling search on a django application, and we found
an interesting problem in having two head-end machines serving our content.
That was basically - how do we keep the indices up to date and intact for
the relevant data? (We wanted the search pieces *immediately* available u
WinXP, Python 2.43 - worked OK for me. Dropped all the goodies into c:\python24\lib\site-packages\django...-joeOn 10/16/06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Didn't work for me on Windows XP with python 2.4.3...what I got isthis:> C:\Documents and Settings\floguy\Desktop\newdjango>setup
13 matches
Mail list logo
