Re: How to stop spam on our groups

2008-01-16 Thread Jorge Gajon
On Jan 16, 2008 8:57 AM, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/12/08, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent > > enhancing django. I used to volunteer on python.org to maintain the > > Python Jobs Board, be

Re: Django-updates mailing list no longer updated

2007-12-08 Thread Jorge Gajon
On Dec 8, 2007 11:42 PM, Jorge Gajon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have not received any email from the "django-updates" mailing list > after December 1st. > I'm sorry, I didn't notice that on Dec 3rd someone wrote here about this and Jacob replied that he

Django-updates mailing list no longer updated

2007-12-08 Thread Jorge Gajon
Hello, I have not received any email from the "django-updates" mailing list after December 1st. After visiting its Google groups page I can see that indeed there haven't been any updates to that mailing list. http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates Maybe the Trac hook responsible for sen

Re: svn properties ?

2007-01-25 Thread Jorge Gajon
On 1/24/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/24/07, Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I could care less about most of the keywords. However, having Rev or > > Id set is handy for the sysadmin down the road trying to figure out > > where the bug came from. > > Isn't t

Trac's timeline feed broken

2007-01-17 Thread Jorge Gajon
Hi! I see that Trac has been updated, and now it looks sweeter! :) However, the timeline rss feed seems to be broken now. Thanks! Jorge --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To

Re: [ANN] Django activities at PyCon 2007

2007-01-02 Thread Jorge Gajon
On 1/2/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howdy folks -- I want to remind everyone that PyCon 2007 is rapidly approaching -- less than two months! -- and that early-bird registration ends Jan. 15th. I've posted a complete roundup of the Django-related activities on the Django 'b

Re: Manipulators going away?

2006-07-11 Thread Jorge Gajon
Hi! Is there a page about these plans on the wiki? I'm interested in seeing how this will change since I currently have around 300+ lines of custom manipulators code in a single project. Of course I'm also interested in seeing if I can help in any way. Thanks! Jorge On 7/11/06, favo <[EMAIL P

Re: Question about manipulators with foreign keys

2006-06-04 Thread Jorge Gajon
Oh I see, I always get a little confused with forward/backward/whatever :) I don't know for sure if this would answer your question, I did something like this in a project (assuming we have a blog object with a set of entries): class MyChangeManipulator(forms.Manipulator): def __init__(self, b

Re: Question about manipulators with foreign keys

2006-06-04 Thread Jorge Gajon
What do you mean by backwards foreign key? On 6/4/06, Tim Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there an existing way to create, say, a ChangeManipulator that > includes a backwards foreign key relationship? > > TK --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this messa

Re: the so-called [AUDIT]

2006-06-03 Thread Jorge Gajon
Unbelievable how can someone spend so much time and effort on trolling like this. It makes you question if someone is paying him to do this, or if he has a serious psychological condition that deserves its own branch of study. Good thing he got spotted sooner than later. On 6/2/06, Julian 'Ju

Re: reverse-lookups, strange behaviour

2006-05-22 Thread Jorge Gajon
y 10.48.162.16 with SMTP id k16mr3937556nfe; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.223.20 with HTTP; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:34:07 -0500 From: "Jorge Gajon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: reverse-lookups, strange behaviour

2006-05-18 Thread Jorge Gajon
> from proj1.app1.models import User > User.objects.get(poll__question__exact='x') > from app1.models import User > User.objects.get(poll__question__exact='x') I don't see any difference except for the 'from' statement. What 'reverse lookup' are you referring to? --~--~-~--~~--