On Nov 8, 2007 7:41 AM, Alexander Solovyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2007 2:21 PM, Jonathan Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On this particular point, from the perspective of the reusable
> > applications themselves, you don't need to wor
On Nov 8, 2007 6:38 AM, Alexander Solovyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - (main trouble) if you have absolutely different applications, which
> use profile for their
> own purposes, you need to merge their Profile models - trouble is in
> the updating of
> this thing (f.e., you have forum, cre
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
>
> On 08-Nov-07, at 6:47 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
>
>>> Django bells, Django bells,
>>> Django all the way;
>>> Oh what fun it is to code
>>> In a well-designed dynamic language!
>> In an open source way!
>
> All night and day!
>
Until next Saturday.
Jonathan.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2922
Could I ask that the functionality proposed in this ticket be
reconsidered for inclusion?
I've encountered a situation where I need to be able to add an outer
join and *also* use the ON clause to specify conditions additional to
the primary key join gene
ework, will I (or someone else)
have to write unit tests for the syndication framework before the patch
goes anywhere? I still wake up in cold sweats thinking about the sheer
variety of tests defined for Mark Pilgrim's feed parser :)
Thanks,
Jonathan.
