Re: Proposal: cacheif template tag

2022-11-07 Thread Joe Tennies
w to put it together when glancing at this section. This section also mentions that "The fragment is cached forever if timeout is None." But it's missing the "A timeout of 0 won’t cache the value." Note that appears in other references for the timeout value. - Joe PS: I

Re: Model inheritance in different modules

2020-01-30 Thread Joe Tennies
tic community. Thanks for your understanding, Adam I'll send you a direct message. Joe On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:02 AM LBris wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Would it be possible to provide a new inheritance mechanism between > classes in Django ? > > I explain my point : >

Re: revisiting the Python version support policy

2019-01-26 Thread Joe Tennies
I don't hear you hear. I do. >>> >>> It's just that I think of this as an accessibility issue, and >>> accessibility is a feature too. >>> >>> For me, if the cost of including someone is that we have to use >>> OrderedDict for a wee-bit l

Re: revisiting the Python version support policy

2019-01-26 Thread Joe Tennies
t; To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/2c23caa4-b83a-4e45-9811-a62af2b4c311%40goog

Re: revisiting the Python version support policy

2019-01-25 Thread Joe Tennies
.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.

Re: revisiting the Python version support policy

2019-01-22 Thread Joe Tennies
x27;m not sure I'm smart enough to understand this... at least at this point in the night. > > I'm more in favour of maintaining the existing policy than playing > favourites with distro support, but not strongly so. The LTS Django is > already covering Python 3.5 for 18 mo

Re: GSoC 2018

2018-03-16 Thread Joe Tennies
Okay, so the idea is to render HTML by generally defining it in Python. I could've sworn that I'd seen something like this years ago, but I'm failing to find it. That stated, I think this is basically a generating version of BeautifulSoup (https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/bs4/doc/) as

Re: GSoC 2018

2018-03-16 Thread Joe Tennies
ngo and have some of that chosen for you and to just start working. I really do wish you the best of luck if you attempt to make this. I'm sure there is a need, but I personally do not see it being a direct fit into Django. Best of luck, Joe On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:27 PM Josh Sme

Re: [RFC]GSoC 2018 Test framework improvement

2018-03-16 Thread Joe Tennies
Django does have a testing framework that's based on the unittest module from Python standard library. That stated, I've seen people use nose and other frameworks in the past. (More info at: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/topics/testing/) I feel there is always a need for better helper util

Re: GSoC 2018

2018-03-14 Thread Joe Tennies
s.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/django-developers/CADwzVRvSLYGOAyxsRWm% > 2BRN4hKwK3S3ig3dQNQzhNj2PRSebP2A%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/m

Re: Adding a database-agnostic JSONField into Django

2018-03-09 Thread Joe Tennies
email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/django-developers/54f8d071-dc0c-47f6-b63e- > c9ec68288527%40googlegroups.com > <https://

Re: Additional PostgreSQL-specific functions

2017-12-04 Thread Joe Tennies
groups.google.com/group/django-developers. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms >>>> gid/django-developers/fa1db399bca544eebeeb0b261752ffeb%40ISS1.ISS.LOCAL >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/fa1db399

Re: Django 2.0 Python version support (Python 3.6+ only?)

2017-08-09 Thread Joe Tennies
Looking at the list, I think the only gain that required 3.5+ was typing. The performance was due to which version was installed and not a real feature. That stated, should the installer add typing from pypi as a requirement (assuming someone adds typing info). On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, 3:01 AM Aymeric

Re: Django 2.0 Python version support (Python 3.6+ only?)

2017-01-18 Thread Joe Tennies
gle.com/d/ > msgid/django-developers/09570028-4eea-41ac-b364- > 93ae2c946b21%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/09570028-4eea-41ac-b364-93ae2c946b21%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

2016-01-08 Thread Joe Tennies
2016 at 3:42 AM, Andrey Antukh wrote: > Hi Joe > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Joe Tennies wrote: > >> I'm not a lawyer, but I care about licensing. >> >> The MIT License would allow you to relicense it, but you must keep the >> original copyrights in tact

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

2016-01-07 Thread Joe Tennies
rs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/568F0D05.3050901%40meyerloew

Re: Feature: Template Components

2015-05-31 Thread Joe Tennies
pers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/a05f2dc1-3515-4b23-96f5-479d2722b82c%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid

Re: Feature: Support Server-Sent Events

2015-05-31 Thread Joe Tennies
scuss such a feature. Keep up the good work. - Joe On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:40:26 PM UTC+1, Emil Stenström wrote: >> >> Client A clicks a button on the site, that sends an normal ajax request >>

Re: django site framework bug, site name swaps back and forth each request

2015-04-19 Thread Joe
@Florian What do you mean the projects are in the same python process? This is a standard implementation of the sites framework above, which leads me to believe there is a bug in django 1.7 On Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 12:03:44 AM UTC-7, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > Hi, > > this is certainly

Re: django site framework bug, site name swaps back and forth each request

2015-04-19 Thread Joe
@Collin, this is not the case. As you can see I have 2 different WSGI files. The contents of them are: #site1_wsgi.py import os os.environ.setdefault("DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE", "site1_settings") from django.core.wsgi import get_wsgi_application application = get_wsgi_application()

django site framework bug, site name swaps back and forth each request

2015-04-18 Thread Joe Estes
I am using django's sites framework. I am calling the site name through a context processor like below. The problem is that every time the page loads, it switches between site1 and site2: def site_info(request): Site.objects.clear_cache()# i tried with and without this site = get_current_

Re: ANN: Django website redesign launched

2014-12-17 Thread Joe Tennies
to, but I can't verify.) Obviously, if there was a good reason for the color change, then my changes are pointless. I just think it's losing the identity. - Joe On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > While I'm sure you didn't mean

Re: A new approach for migrations?

2014-10-16 Thread Joe Tennies
First this is really a question for the django-users group. This is more for actually developing Django. I think the root of your issue is actually the app loading feature and not migrations. Your models should be lazy loading each other (using the string version not directly importing). Secondly,

Re: What are the best reasons for when and why people should use Django?

2014-08-10 Thread Joe Tennies
emails from it, send an > email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.g

Re: Deprecate FCGI support in Django 1.7

2013-07-23 Thread Joe Tennies
Is there a specific reason to call this "django-fastcgi"? I think it should most likely be a generic wsgi to fastcgi binding, right? Or is this project mainly the django management commands? On Jul 22, 2013 8:07 PM, "Curtis Maloney" wrote: > Well, having started looking over the flup source, I ca

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

2013-05-13 Thread Joe Tennies
il to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- Joe

Re: Transforming django-admin.py to a shell script

2013-03-02 Thread Joe Tennies
;Django developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com

Re: Single record models

2012-08-22 Thread Joe Tennies
Please use the django-users mailing list. This is for the development of Django itself. Thanks, Joe On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Richard Dodd wrote: > Is this the solution I'm looking for > https://github.com/sciyoshi/django-dbsettings? I'm looking for similar > fields t

Re: Redesign of djangoproject.com?

2012-04-30 Thread Joe Tennies
o categorize the rest, but I am usually annoyed by ending up on someone's site and not exactly knowing where to go. I've been messing with Adobe Proto lately. I'll see if I can put more showin' and less jibber-jabberin' ;) - Joe Tennies -- You received this message because

Re: Schema Alteration API proposal

2012-03-19 Thread Joe Tennies
not part of this (as has been pointed out on this conversation already). If you look, you can tell the ideas are mainly based off South at this point, but I have been looking at nashvegas to see if they have anything else to add. -- Joe Tennies tenn...@gmail.com -- You received this message bec

Re: auth.User refactor: reboot

2012-03-18 Thread Joe Tennies
uch use unless you can say "Hello "", you are > really saying that the user isn't much without the profile data. It's > a very short step from wanting to display the user's name to wanting > to display his email or something else. > > > Personally, I do

Re: authentication by email

2012-03-11 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
<https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/ref/models/fields/> would be a good place. I know we aren't going to change any code for this release, as there is still discussion on this, but I thought this would be a good start. Thanks, Joe Tennies -- You received this message because yo

Re: authentication by email

2012-03-11 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
my memory. Also, is the following the thread you are thinking of? http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/6239a63c9ad874b5/ Thanks in advance, Joe Tennies Also, Russell, I didn't know you were the one behind django-evolution. I may need to pick your brain at some

Re: authentication by email

2012-03-09 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group a

Re: Django participation in Google Summer of Code 2012

2012-03-08 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
;Django developers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > django-developers@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > groups

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

2012-02-26 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
Sorry all, I think I got my conversations mixed up. I was thinking this was the whitespace conversation also going on. 2012/2/26 Łukasz Rekucki > On 26 February 2012 05:55, Joe & Anne Tennies wrote: > > While this would be a valid argument if Django templates only rendered > H

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

2012-02-25 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
27;t take polls. > > > > It's useful because it helps some templaets in some cases be more > readable > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to dj

Re: start using less (and bootstrap!)

2012-02-03 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
s needed in the ORM and schema revision tracking, etc.) Then include a simple implementation that can migrate databases via some script but not autodetect changes. Basically, I see a big need for Django to start providing specifications to how things -- Joe & Anne Tennies tenn...@gmail.com --

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-10 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
So, with the current plan to add 3.x support to 1.5 and the plan to remove 2.5.x support in 1.5. Should all the exception handling blocks be converted to "except MyExceptionClass as e:" style notation then? This also removes the need for u() and b(), right? This is because 2.6.x supports u' ' and b

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-09 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
g/django-developers/-/Y8-2tS9lth4J. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django

Re: Python 3 port - all MySQL tests now pass on 2.6.7 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-09 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > > -- Joe & Anne Tennies tenn...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.5.4, 2.6.2, 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-06 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
's because psycopg2 won't run upper on something that's not a unicode in python 3, but it needs to be a bytestring later to have the "buffer interface" implemented. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Joe & Anne Tennies wrote: > Updated: > > I thought I'd put

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.5.4, 2.6.2, 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-06 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
; A template can be loaded from an egg > -- > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "/home/joe/Projects/django2-3/django/tests/regressiontests/templates/loaders.py", > line 88, in test_existing > >

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.5.4, 2.6.2, 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-06 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
lem. +) ERROR: test_existing (regressiontests.templates.loaders.EggLoaderTest) A template can be loaded from an egg -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/joe/Projects/django2-3/django/tests/regressiontests/templates/loaders.py", line 88, in t

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.5.4, 2.6.2, 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-05 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
ail to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > > -- Joe & Anne Tennies tenn...@gmail

Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-02 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
group. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. >

Re: Sane defaults for Startapp and Startproject

2011-10-18 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
r settings like this that 'slide' a default value in w/o your knowledge, I'd like it to add to the settings.py by default. Most problems I have helping people is a default value that's not explicitly done in the settings.py, so people don't realize it's something they ca

Re: deprecation vs removal

2011-10-03 Thread Joe & Anne Tennies
I know that no one knows who I am, but I'm going to say that this is becoming a bike shed. It sounds like there's generally agreement that people need to be warned that something is going to be removed. It sounds like people that maintain code that is required to be stable and relies on other peop

Customizable Separator for slugify

2011-01-03 Thread Joe Jasinski
fe(re.sub('[-\s]+', '-', value)) 209 slugify.is_safe = True 210 slugify = stringfilter(slugify) This is my first post on Django Developers, so I figure I'd introduce myself. My name is Joe and I'm a Django web developer in Chicago. I've been working wi

Re: Final call for feedback: Multi-db

2010-01-04 Thread Joe
oving forward :) Thanks, Joe On Dec 23 2009, 4:04 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Michael Manfre wrote: > > With multiple database defined, what is the expected behavior for > > syncdb and the otherdbrelated commands? > > The management comm

Re: Doubt about urlencode filter implementation

2009-10-25 Thread Joe Tyson
I believe that's the expected outcome.. The use is to encode something for the use in an URL... Eg. convert "some-crazy//user?input" into something that can safely be passed into http://www.google.com/search?q=URL_ENCODED_STRING On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Danilo Cabello wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: Google-app-engine-patch

2009-07-29 Thread Joe Tyson
This list is for the development of django itself. Please direct this question to the django-users list, and for any further questions regarding developing with django. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:12 AM, franxx wrote: > > does anyone have any idea how to serve non-html content on GAE using > the a

Re: Reading data from database tied to another Django project?

2009-07-10 Thread Joe Tyson
This list is about django development it-self, not about developing with django. Please send this question to django-users. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Kreeger wrote: > > Here's the situation: I've got two projects, both Django. One is a > simple, public-facing website that renders

Re: Posting to the wrong list (was: Re: Need Django Developer urgent)

2009-05-08 Thread Joe Tyson
Big bold letters: *** THIS LIST IS NOT FOR DJANGO HELP - USE DJANGO USERS FOR THAT *** On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Dave Smith wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote: > >> Add the word "core" to make the first sentence, "Discussion group for >> Django core developers"

Re: Integrating fckeditor with django

2009-04-29 Thread Joe Tyson
This is a question that should be directed to django-users. Django-developers is a list dedicated to discussing of developing django itself. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:53 PM, megaman821 wrote: > > I see fckeditor has python functions for its quick upload and image > browsing. Is anyone using this

Re: WTForm should be inbuilt to Django, and make admin & others use it.

2009-03-18 Thread Joe Tyson
I really hate to be a pessimist, but if the functionality already exists for that much generation, why bother integrating it with the main django package? On Mar 18, 8:06 pm, Jari Pennanen wrote: > WTForm is simple implementation built on top of existing (new)forms to > help create fieldsets, an

Re: django in javascript

2009-03-11 Thread Joe Tyson
e, and let other developers handle this stuff. - Joe On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Eduardo Cereto Carvalho < eduardocer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned about it going into core. That's not > my purpose here. But I really think this is something b

Re: Dynamic SITE_ID (again)

2008-11-06 Thread Joe
Joey Wilhelm wrote: > I also found a snippet which implements something similar, here: > http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1099/ > Of course, the snippet didn't really work right and had to be beaten > into submission to even give the illusion of working. I also referred to that snippet for

Re: Django way for adding a cache backend?

2008-06-09 Thread Joe Bowman
> >  http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7398 > > On Jun 3, 10:10 pm, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Joe Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Should I just create it and > > &g

Django way for adding a cache backend?

2008-06-03 Thread Joe Bowman
Hello, I'm sure you've seen your share of new Django/Python developers come by this group since the prerelease of Google Appengine, and I'm yet another one. I'm trying to determine what the best way to add a cache backend to Django might be? Preferably I'd like to do it in a way so that it's easy

Re: psycopg (both 1 and 2) may drop support for multiple interpreters (used by mod_python and mod_wsgi)

2007-10-29 Thread Joe
full capacity. I think our end goal is to use less ram and more processor. On Oct 29, 12:46 pm, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there anyone out there using mod_wsgi on a high-traffic site who > can vouch for how it performs? > > If I were to switch all of my sites ove

Re: psycopg (both 1 and 2) may drop support for multiple interpreters (used by mod_python and mod_wsgi)

2007-10-29 Thread Joe
wrote: > On Oct 26, 11:07 pm, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > First off, I would warn anyone out there that with about 40 virtual > > hosts using Django, each apache (prefork) instance can get over 60 > > megs. We didn't realize this until the server started swa

Re: psycopg (both 1 and 2) may drop support for multiple interpreters (used by mod_python and mod_wsgi)

2007-10-26 Thread Joe
educe memory usage. I would love to be able to keep apache and mod_python, so this would be good news. On Oct 24, 9:16 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:34 +, Joe wrote: > > If I understand this correctly, if you implemented this, coul

Re: psycopg (both 1 and 2) may drop support for multiple interpreters (used by mod_python and mod_wsgi)

2007-10-24 Thread Joe
If I understand this correctly, if you implemented this, could I use the same python interpreter between multiple virtual hosts and not worry about overlap? On Oct 21, 8:04 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Graham (and Jeremy, who originally started the thread), > > > > On Su

Re: proposal: update QuerySet.get() to return a default if object does not exist?

2007-10-15 Thread Joe
Actually, I don't want a 404, just to pass 'None' in as the value for "object". On Oct 12, 10:31 am, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/12/07, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't know

Re: proposal: update QuerySet.get() to return a default if object does not exist?

2007-10-12 Thread Joe
I don't know how many times I've wanted to to this: return render_to_response("template.html", {"object":Model.objects.get(parameter=value)}) instead of that exception handling. On Aug 23, 2:09 am, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/22/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Django 100% threadsafe with DB?

2007-09-25 Thread Joe Holloway
Do you have the transaction middleware enabled? Given that you do not have unique constraints on field Y/Z, I believe this would be the expected behavior with transactions enabled. Both threads conceptually have their own "picture" of what the database looked like when the transaction was starte

Re: Login required across entire project Middleware

2006-10-31 Thread Joe
etc? I really grok the need for the Askimet TRAC filter, but it has blocked me several times now in even submitting patches to documentation. -joe On Oct 31, 7:09 am, "Jay Parlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/27/06, Jared Kuolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: SOC Integration Plan/Policy/Timeline

2006-09-11 Thread Joe
Any progress on this? We should make a timeline. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe fro

Q

2006-08-28 Thread Joe
Ian Holsman wrote: > all of these types of things should get as much info as possible out > of the database/models that exist > having to retype the relationships sounds yuko to me. > > but hey... I'm not a ruby guy.. maybe they like doing these kind of > things. This is a limitation of support

Re: Row Level Permissions Update

2006-08-18 Thread Joe
Oops, I see it now. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send ema

Re: Row Level Permissions Update

2006-08-18 Thread Joe
wrote: > I'm considering doing what you describe, it shouldn't be too hard to > implement and will probably be updating the branch with the code > tomorrow depending on any unforeseen problems. > > Chris > > > Joe wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is mor

Re: Row Level Permissions Update

2006-08-17 Thread Joe
I'm not sure if this is more relevant to the Generic Authorization branch, but has anyone looked at implementing the owner permissions (the user who creates the object automatically has delete/modify permissions)? For example, a META field sort of like the following: class Meta: row_l

Re: JavaScript and Changeset 3541

2006-08-17 Thread Joe
Max Derkachev wrote: > There's no established use of Dojo with Django yet. > Hopefully, there would be no such "established uses" with any JS > library. Django is a server-side framework. Even id Django is our > framework of choice, let us decide which client-side framework to use > in our applic

Re: Proposal: Saving SECRET_KEY in a seperate file

2006-08-07 Thread Joe
Wouldn't you want to put your database settings (Username and password) in another file as well? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django

Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tom Tobin wrote: > > On 7/27/06, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In line with other sentiments I've expressed here in the past: IMHO, > > this means your *project manager* is addled, not Django's release > > proces

Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Joe
Tom Tobin wrote: > In line with other sentiments I've expressed here in the past: IMHO, > this means your *project manager* is addled, not Django's release > process. If you can understand that the development version is stable > enough to use, but your project manager can't, your project manage

Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Joe
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > On 7/27/06, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder, then, why .95 has been held off so long. > > Hey Joe, > > There's no real reason, other than the fact that the core developers > all use (and are happy with) the Subversion/dev

Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Joe
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > Release management is a little more faceted than that. You do understand > that any Open Source project has multiple releases, right? Putting out > periodic releases to act as checkpoints, regardless of whether it is the > ultimate, be-all-and-end-all release has benef

Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Joe
I saw this post, but I wasn't sure a consensus had been reached. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To

Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Joe
I know that the release of a .95 version of Django is a touchy subject around here, but I really would like to see a .95 release, even if you have to call it a beta to signify not all issues are resolved. As a programmer, I know that I could just go to the subversion trunk and checkout the code.

Re: MS SQL Server access from Linux/ODBC?

2006-07-24 Thread Joe
Have you considered migrating the data from MSSQL to Postgres? We ran into the same problem you are having, and purchased the "DTM Migration Kit". http://www.sqledit.com/mk/index.html This tool lets you do arbitrary sql on migration, so if the MSSQL database is being used by another app, you can

Why do templates error if you reference non-existent attributes?

2006-04-12 Thread Joe Button
Hi. {% ifequal thing1.id someid %} fails if I pass None as thing1. "Failed lookup for key [id] in None" Is there a good reason for this? Shouldn't it be silently ignored like other non-existent things referenced in templ