Re: django-restapi Improvements Proposal

2008-03-10 Thread Jared Flatow
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:15 AM, David Larlet wrote: > * ModelForm instead of model_for_* which are now deprecated (not > finished, still in my todo), your implementation do not cover html yet I wonder if you could give an example from your application where you need forms? Perhaps I can create an

Re: django-restapi Improvements Proposal

2008-03-10 Thread Jared Flatow
On Mar 10, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Justin Fiore wrote: > FYI, I had created a simple google code project that has classes for > all of the HTTP response codes listed in the "RESTful Webservices > Book". > Instead of adding them to django.http (since that issue was already > address and denied). Oops I

Re: django-restapi Improvements Proposal

2008-03-07 Thread Jared Flatow
On Mar 7, 2008, at 3:19 AM, versae wrote: > After working with great intensity with django-restapi we discovered > some fails and some unimplemented features, Anything in particular? > but our code is so large, > and I don't know whether your code proposal is backward compatible or > whether it

django-restapi Improvements Proposal

2008-03-06 Thread Jared Flatow
Hi all, Forgive me if this is slightly off topic, but I hope to get some feedback on the design of what I think is an improved version of the django-rest-interface. I have posted a gzipped archive of the code and an example application here: http://code.google.com/p/django-rest-interface/i

Re: Having problems getting django running under apache and mod_python

2007-10-29 Thread Jared Flatow
Looks like you want to just add '/Users/rudolph/Sites' to your PythonPath: this is the path that Python is searching for the moose module in, not the path of the moose module itself (therefore just get rid of the trailing moose). You'll probably also want to reference your settings module

Re: Documentation restructuring

2007-10-18 Thread Jared Flatow
On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > Django's docs, at one point, set the bar for open source documentation > projects. Now it is, IMHO, merely better than average. No offense > intended to anyone. :) From what I've seen I'd agree. >> While Django is excellent >> for rapidly p

Re: Documentation restructuring

2007-10-18 Thread Jared Flatow
On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Marty Alchin wrote: > On 10/18/07, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd like to improve the quality of Django's documentation. > > I can't say I'm surprised to hear that. I've heard several requests > for changes in the documentation. Heck, I think I've eve