As of r20, django-atompub now includes a `LegacySyndicationFeed`
class (in atom.py) which implements the same signature for `__init__`
and `add_item` as django's existing `SyndicationFeed` does but under
the covers is a new `AtomFeed`.
I haven't fully tested it but I'm hoping this addresses
On 10/08/2007, at 9:27 AM, Rob Hudson wrote:
> I know the basics of what Atom is and what AtomPub is (but not quite
> clear on where REST and full AtomPub differ or relate -- they sound
> like they have a lot of overlap where maybe REST is at the HTTP level
> and AtomPub is more on implementation
> It's gonna be tricky figuring out the "right" way to handle this,
> especially because "right" is going to differ greatly depending on
> audience.
There are also a number of difference scenarios:
1. a user has written a Feed using either RSS or the existing Atom1
and it meets their needs.
2.
On 09/08/2007, at 7:58 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Are you looking for feedback in general (as in "is anybody using it?",
> a.k.a. "is this microphone on?") or as a resolution for #3569 and
> inclusion in contrib/syndication?
I think there is still some polishing to do for including in contri
ticket #3569.
James
--
James Tauber http://jtauber.com/
journeyman of some http://jtauber.com/blog/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to
pproved my comment yet)
James
[1] http://blog.ianbicking.org/2007/08/02/pronouncing-django/
--
James Tauber http://jtauber.com/
journeyman of some http://jtauber.com/blog/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
t;"
The biggest risk with that approach is that it's easy to make the
entire feed malformed by making a mistake here.
Thoughts?
On 01/08/2007, at 11:51 PM, Jason Davies wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 5:21 pm, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As of r11, the full da
As of r11, the full data model for the Atom Format (RFC 4287) is now
implemented.
On 31/07/2007, at 4:19 AM, James Tauber wrote:
>
> As described here[1], I finally got around to working on improving
> django support for the Atom Publishing Format. There's been a ticket
> [
nally_working_on_django-atompub
[2] http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3569
[3] http://django-atompub.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/atompub/atom.py
[4] http://code.google.com/p/django-atompub/wiki/UserGuide
[5] http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3570
--
James Tauber http://jtauber.com/
jour
If Django wasn't successful in their application to GSoC, a couple of
mentors could sign up under the auspices of the Python Software
Foundation. I can't guarantee how many slots you'd get (if any) but
it's worth a try. A bunch of Python-related projects that didn't get
accepted in their o
iscussions as well because APP is a
particularly nice example of a RESTful approach.
If people have particular thoughts on either format or protocol
support, email me and/or let's discuss on this list.
James
--
James Tauber http://jtauber.com/
jour
11 matches
Mail list logo
