Hi,
Thanks everybody for the info.
James, thanks for the effort to still support the 0.91 branch, It's
much appreciated.
Best
jakub
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post
Hi,
At the company I work for most of the sites run django and I have been
pushing hard for it's adoption, while facing a lot of adversity from
all kinds of camps most notably the .NET and java.
I have already proven that django/python is enterprise ready, faster
to develop in, and performs extr
if request.META['HTTPS'] == 'on':
django.conf.settings.MEDIA_URL =
django.conf.settings.HTTPS_MEDIA_URL
return None
Is this a good way to go about this? Any thoughts?
Thanks
jakub
On 5/5/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
27;]
return self._meta
def _get_raw_post_data(self):
Is this a good/bad idea? Any thoughts? Let me know if you guys find it
useful I can add a patch to trac.
Best Regards
jakub
On 5/5/06, Jakub Labath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have web server that i
Hi Steven,
Thanks but I don't seem to have the 'wsgi.url_scheme' available in my
request.META could it be becuase I'm using apache and mod_python?
On 5/5/06, Steven Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 05/05/06 19:33, Jakub Labath wrote:
> > Hi,
>
().replace('-', '_')
self._meta[key] = value
+if 'HTTPS' in self._req.subprocess_env:
+self._meta['HTTPS'] = self._req.subprocess_env['HTTPS']
return self._meta
def _get_raw_post_data(self):
On 5/5/06, Jakub Lab
Hi,
My first attempt at #22 is in trac.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/22
It's just a quick thing that I needed. But I will welcome suggestions
and ideas how to make this better.
Best Regards
On 3/12/06, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> never go round to it - havent even st
Hi,
On 11/11/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ado_mssql backend, which uses adodbapi, does indeed convert
> dates/times to Python datetime objects. Can you give it a shot and see
> how well the driver works? Progress has stopped on testing the
> ado_mssql backend, and I'd like
Hi,
I finally got around to look into this further. Here is Adrian's advice.
On 10/22/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you need to do is make sure the driver typecasts datetime
> database fields to Python datetime.date objects, and date database
> fields to Python datetime.d
On 11/8/05, Eric Walstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 08 November 2005 08:35, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> > I think we need to bite our lips, suck it up, and release a 1.0
> > version.
>
> +1
>
> A "stable" release would make those who are trusting my judgement in
> choosing Django for
On 10/22/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What you need to do is make sure the driver typecasts datetime
> database fields to Python datetime.date objects, and date database
> fields to Python datetime.date objects. Some database drivers do this
> automatically, but others provid
Hi
>
> But DateTime objects can be used to represent both; you just have a
> DateTime object with no time values.
Yes true, but it creates an error when running unittests, and I'm
assuming the tests are in place for a reason.
Best
jakub
Hi
As mentioned, I'm working on Microsoft SQL back end using pymssql.
It's going OK and I'm down to 12 errors in runtests.py.
But I hit a problem I could use some help with.
best shown by code
my model in dateapp is
# Create your models here.
class MyDate(meta.Model):
day=meta.DateField()
Hi,
this is a great news and I may be able to help with some stuff.
I do have access and I was able to test it.
the patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED] is fine however bit out of date though.
For example it's lacking get_table_list which then makes either
unittests or django-admin init crash almost ri
14 matches
Mail list logo
