Adi Sieker schrieb:
>
> The IP6AddressField also handles IPv4 addresses, as mentioned in the
> docs section of the patch.
>
> +.. class:: IP6AddressField([**options])
> +
> +An IPv4 or IPv6 address, in string format (e.g. "192.0.2.30" or
> +"2a01:5d8:25ae:9451:20d:39bc:1e6:cab:b2c"). The admin r
Hello,
> The way I read the comments on the ticket the last patch supports IPv4
> and IPv6 address.
> See: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/811#comment:16
Adi, if you mean this:
* attachment ipv6-9781.diff added.
IPv6 patch for trunk, revision 9781
yes you are right, the
Hello,
Ian Kelly schrieb:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Gregor Kling
> wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> Regrettably the IPAddressField implementation is not what I expect :-(.
>> Is there by any chance, the possibilty to have a solution that works for
>&
Hello there,
Regrettably the IPAddressField implementation is not what I expect :-(.
Is there by any chance, the possibilty to have a solution that works for
ipv4 *and* ipv6 in the near future ?
I know you have tons of things to do before the release of the
outstanding 1.1.
So far, I do hav
