I'm not overly familiar with how Django versions are decided, but from what
I know about semver, the example you give is not quite correct.
>From the semver website:
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the:
MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes,MINOR version when y
I think this is a good idea, and I'd be interested in getting involved in
this effort. I've been wanting to get more involved so I'll put my name
forward for this, and all that it may entail!
Greg
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tim Graham wrote:
> continuing
> https://groups.google.com/d/top
Would "Ready for merge" not be a more appropriate term? To me, check-in is
a term I would associate with SVN.
- Greg
On 16 Jun 2014 18:06, "Tim Graham" wrote:
> +1 to "check-in"
>
> On Monday, June 16, 2014 12:08:43 PM UTC-4, Daniele Procida wrote:
>>
>> "Ready For Check-in" appears in the docs
