That's a great question. My guess would be that there is an equivalent in
some languages but not all. It is tricky, though; French at least has both
equivalent phrasings, but the localization is actually already using the
phrasing that more closely matches "in five minutes."
Some translations coul
On 3 Oct 2016, at 16:39, django-developers@googlegroups.com wrote:
=
Today's topic summary
=
Group: django-developers@googlegroups.com
Url:
decided on this
because I was actually proposing modifying some of Django's classes
themselves; if get_form_kwargs works, I obviously wouldn't need to do that.
Thanks again
Greg
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:12:53 PM UTC-6, Curtis Maloney wrote:
>
> Firstly, I think this query
parent class,
then adding the request.user to the form.instance. This works, but has the
side effect of also being called during GET requests, which doesn't break
anything but is suboptimal.
Does that all make sense? Am I missing a more obvious way of doing this?
Thanks,
Greg
--
You re
Hello-
I was wondering if it would be reasonable to modify the
`django.views.generic.edit.ProcessFormView` class, such that the `post()`
function calls a (hypothetical) `self.validate_form(form)` function rather
than directly calling `form.is_valid()`. The default implementation of
`validate_f
#x27;m happy to submit a pull request if the
core devs agree.
Cheers,
Greg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em
Done.
On 10 Sep 2014, at 10:45, Andrew Godwin wrote:
Looks good - make a pull request and I'll hit merge.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Greg Brown
wrote:
How's this?
https://github.com/gregplaysguitar/django/commit/b4d486c80ff6bdfaec8f85e724b44ce5e74a5bb6
On Wednesday, 10
How's this?
https://github.com/gregplaysguitar/django/commit/b4d486c80ff6bdfaec8f85e724b44ce5e74a5bb6
On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 09:42:52 UTC+12, Greg Brown wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the rapid responses! I wasn't aware that South imported the
> custom fie
'd be good to explicitly document this - I'll have a look at
that now.
Greg
On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 09:30:47 UTC+12, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
> Carl is correct, South serialized a dotted path to the field while Django
> writes an import in, but it's the same thing i
design decision, i.e. we now expected to make sure imports in our
migration files always work in the future? What are the reasons for
this? I can imagine this causing issues when refactoring old code for
example.
Thanks,
Greg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
eft with the extra zero as
you mention, which to me seems just a bit redundant.
I'm all for using semver, though! So +1 on the suggestion.
Greg
On 14 Jul 2014 18:07, "Collin Anderson" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just saw #23015 come through (1.9 -> 2.0 not an earth-shatterin
I think this is a good idea, and I'd be interested in getting involved in
this effort. I've been wanting to get more involved so I'll put my name
forward for this, and all that it may entail!
Greg
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tim Graham wrote:
> continuing
> https:
Would "Ready for merge" not be a more appropriate term? To me, check-in is
a term I would associate with SVN.
- Greg
On 16 Jun 2014 18:06, "Tim Graham" wrote:
> +1 to "check-in"
>
> On Monday, June 16, 2014 12:08:43 PM UTC-4, Daniele Procida wrote:
>>
Good to know about native migrations, and the interim solution seems
reasonable.
Thanks so much!
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:56:38 AM UTC-5, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
> On 19/06/12 16:13, Greg Aker wrote:
> > Florian:
> >
> > I don't think waiting for migrations
e to run a manual
SQL query to alter those columns.
If this is a core philosophy not to ask users to run manual queries on
updates, is starting with a patch to enforce limits here a good thing?
Thanks,
-greg
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:12:47 AM UTC-5, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>
> Hi
rovide validation on the lengths to be entered when performing
syncdb.
I'm happy to work on a patch/tests if there is interest. For now, when a
slightly longer class name is needed, the only real way around it is to
alter the model & the db, which is not ideal.
Thanks in advance!
ibe from this group, send email to
> django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
--
Dr Greg Turner
Director, Technical Information Architect
the Interaction Consortium
http://interaction.ne
n't do any heavy lifting in either realm.
--
Greg Donald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
ctionary for designers to understand.
How is something like {{ view.myvar }} any harder than {{ myvar }} for
those two designers in the whole world who actually want to touch the
code?
--
Greg Donald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers
k.
> Now you have to add the method *and* pass it along in the
> dictionary. Double work?
It is double the work, no doubt about it. Not to mention on
complicated views the context dictionary gets quite long. At that
point I usually just package everything up as a single entry.
--
Greg Do
Hi,
I have a patch for #11930 that in to be applied against djangoproject.com's
base.css file. As far as I can see, base.css is not in the project
repository. Who is the custodian of this file, and the other CSS files? Is
there a reason it's not in the repo?
Greg.
--
Dr Greg Turne
Count me in...
G
On Apr 7, 10:54 am, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> We've firmed up the Dallas Django sprint plans:
>
> Django 1.1 is around the corner, but there are lots of bugs left to
> squash. Come meet the other Django people around Dallas and check out
> Cohabitat, the great coworking spot in upt
rovide general access tools for emerging community data
repositories such as:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata and
http://bret.appspot.com/entry/we-need-a-wikipedia-for-data
This would be useful for more than just localflavor, but of course the
country-specific mo
23 matches
Mail list logo
