Re: Opinions sought on m2m signal ordering

2010-03-28 Thread Firat Can Basarir
However I still believe, as a user of the framework, having 2 signals, before and after, are the best way to go. It is the most intuitive and clear way to provide this functionality. On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Firat Can Basarir < firatcanbasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sa

Re: Opinions sought on m2m signal ordering

2010-03-28 Thread Firat Can Basarir
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the new features in 1.2 are signals on m2m operations [1]. > > Recently, Ticket #13087 was opened questioning the order in which m2m > signals are sent. I'm calling for any comments or opinions on exactly > how this