I'd be interested in helping out as well In any way I can. I'm a technical
writer/editor by day so if there is a need for someone to oversee or assist
with documentation I'd be delighted. Of course I'm willing to help out on
anything.
Best,
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 7, 2010, at 4:15 P
I have about 4 apple Xserves with quad cores and 16 GBs or RAM sitting
in my server room at work. I will see if I can use them for this
purpose. I don't think it will be a problem since I'm the CIO and am
pretty much left alone to do what i want with our hardware. I'll post
back next week a
On May 3, 2:51 am, "M. N. Islam Shihan" wrote:
> It should be possible to provide a fallback to go with unencrypted
> authentication @ server side depending on whether a flag set at client
> side by javascript (using cookie or hidden field).
>
> Anyway, the only limitation of this technique i
On Apr 12, 1:51 am, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> Accessing a reverse OneToOneField mapping with no object raises
> DoesNotExist (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10227). I think
> the difference between when an object is expected and when None is an
> ordinary result is strong and common enough to
If there's no objections by tomorrow I'm going to reopen http://
code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10596
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to djan
Sorry for pushing about this right after the feature was committed,
but I have a problem with the way the feature was done.
Specifically, I don't like the fact that "delete selected objects" is
enabled by default. Although I'm glad to have the bulk edit feature,
none of my models are designed at
