Re: Skip session save on 500 responses

On Saturday, July 7, 2012 3:46:14 AM UTC-5, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > On Friday, July 6, 2012 12:02:56 AM UTC+2, Luke Plant wrote: >> >> I agree it should be changed, and I would regard it as a bug fix, but >> make a note of it in the 1.5 release notes nonetheless. >> > > +1 > > Cheers, > Flor

Re: Small decision needed on #15025

On Jan 13, 7:05 am, Luke Plant wrote: > > In conclusion, I'm going to leave [14992] in. Due to the backwards > incompatibility discovered, it's not a good idea to backport to 1.2.X. > But since it is cleaning up an inconsistency/ambiguity, I'm happy to > leave it in, and say that code that was r

Re: Small decision needed on #15025

Bah. Premature send. That was supposed to say: On Jan 12, 6:08 pm, Don Spaulding wrote: > On Jan 12, 4:23 pm, Tai Lee wrote: > > On Jan 13, 5:06 am, Don Spaulding wrote: > > > This feels too magical to me, and it still leaves the possibility for > > ambiguous behavi

Re: Small decision needed on #15025

On Jan 12, 4:23 pm, Tai Lee wrote: > On Jan 13, 5:06 am, Don Spaulding wrote: > > > > > I will say that the debug template has been > > "relying on the bug" since 2005.  By my estimation, that makes nearly > > every template ever created a candidate for

Re: Small decision needed on #15025

On Jan 11, 8:31 pm, Luke Plant wrote: > > So we then have to think about what is sensible behaviour, and I think > the new behaviour is much simpler and saner, and much more consistent > with itself. I agree. > Also, given the nature of the Django's template system > (i.e. usable for designers

Small decision needed on #15025

Hi django-devs, Prior to r14992 (which is the fix for #7153), the way a callable context variable was resolved depended on where it was in the lookup chain. Sometimes it was invoked, other times it was treated as a first-class function. r14992 changed that behavior so that the callable is always

Re: Proposal: installmedia command - A story for distributing media with apps

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Brian Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > $ python manage.py installmedia appname [appname ...] > > The command is "dumb.".. Could it be a little smarter, and in the absence of specific apps, iterate over all INSTALLED_APPS, and install their media automagic

Re: [Fwd: Documentation: Google-foo lost]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Don Spaulding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Hope it's useful! > and of course it isn't. I forgot my lambdas. Doh! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to t

Re: [Fwd: Documentation: Google-foo lost]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It would be > fantastic if such a mapping existed, and I don't think you'd get any > objections from the core developers if such a mapping were to > magically materialize. > poof! I took a shot at finding redir

Re: Checkboxes in admin

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Alex Rades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > Is there a reason for checkboxes (BooleanField) in admin having the > label on the right side instead of left? Consistent alignment? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message

Re: newforms-admin branch has been merged into trunk

Giggidy giggidy. On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Julien Phalip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Brian, Karen and all the NFA team for this massive > contribution!! > > On Jul 19, 10:01 am, Brian Rosner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have just recently merged the newforms-admin branch into

Re: Good IDE setup to use for large Django projects suggestions

The Code Janitor wrote: > Although it is a lot smarter about python development I am wondering > if there is a better alternative. > This list is for discussion of the development *of* django, not with it (or python in general, for that matter). The django-users group is a much better forum

Re: Rethinking silent failures in templates

Graham King wrote: > And if Django had logging, we could have a SQL log, and I wouldn't > have to start all my projects by setting up a logger, a SQL logging > middleware, and an audit log of object create/update/delete. I trust you've seen the django-logging project on c.g.c? http://code.googl

Re: Django port on OpenVMS - Oracle/Rdb backend

Collin Grady wrote: > Steve Holden said the following: > >> If you want considered opinions you would do well to wait longer than 51 >> minutes! >> > > You should check the date as well as the time; he sent the first email > *two days* before the second. > Steve, perhaps next year at

Re: Queryset-refactor branch has been merged into trunk

Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > I merged queryset-refactor into trunk just now. This was changeset > r7477. Thanks for all of your effort on this, Malcolm. Malcolm's Amazon Wishlist: http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/registry.html?ie=UTF8&type=wishlist&id=1VB5A16R2KV0T

Re: Getting Images to display in Development Environment

No, I meant #python, because you're almost always in #django.  :-P Good catch. Don Spaulding Collin Grady wrote: Don Spaulding said the following: into the irc channel (#python on irc.freenode.net) to get the help I think you mean #django on irc.freenod

Re: Getting Images to display in Development Environment

annel (#python on irc.freenode.net) to get the help you're looking for, if indeed you're still stuck. Don Spaulding On Nov 18, 11:02 am, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am new to Django and Python and trying to learn by going thru an > open source application called V

Re: newforms subclassing

On Oct 15, 7:42 am, Tobias Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug? Hi Tobias, You are running into a form_for_model bug[1]. SmileyChris has tried to address this in [2], but his solution met with a little resistance on Trac, with the final comment being

Re: Missing patch files on code.djangoproject.com

Jacob, if you didn't like my patch to #231, you could've just said so, you didn't have to delete patches from others to cover your trail.  :-)  Uploading now... Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: On 9/18/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I could reupload that one, but there are

Re: Let's schedule a Django sprint

On Sep 7, 11:51 am, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Google Chicago is for sure, but I'm not sure yet about Mountain View. I know it's kind of late notice, but do we need to do anything to let Google know we are coming besides sign up on the wiki page? Also, what do we need to brin

Re: Getting users to read the right docs (was Re: Time for a new release?)

Oh, and: [1]: http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/djangoproject.com/django_website/apps/docs --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django

Getting users to read the right docs (was Re: Time for a new release?)

I'm also a lurker on the dev list, so excuse the interruption.  James Bennett wrote: Thus, the problem to solve here is simple: how do we ensure that someone who downloads the 0.96 release uses the 0.96 version of the documentation? Bundling HTML versions of the docs isn't a solution,

Re: Django t-shirts?

It seems like you would need to have a good grasp on what all of the expenses were before you could decide how to meet them. LJ sponsors the project site right? What other development expenses are there? A few possibilities I thought of: - Core devs' travel expense? - Conference materials (do yo