>
> I'd bet an extremely large portion of those users don't absolutely have to
> have an increased username field. They've gone this long without it.
>
They (we) have gone this long, not because we didn't need it, but because
we didn't think of it in the very beginning, and after that it was too
ailed on this idea? :(
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 3:27:35 AM UTC-5, Daniel Hawkins wrote:
>
> Yes please! Since contrib.auth.models.User.email is an EmailField, that
> change will require everyone to run a migration, right? Then we might as
> well change the character limit on the
Yes please! Since contrib.auth.models.User.email is an EmailField, that
change will require everyone to run a migration, right? Then we might as
well change the character limit on the username field at the same time, no?
And any other defaults that might be less-than-reasonable?
I was going
