Glad you like the design, but I'm a he. :)
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:58:58 AM UTC-7, Wim Feijen wrote:
>
> Hi Jacob,
>
> I was wondering whether there were any entries and whether a decision has
> been taken to appoint a benevolent redesigner?
>
> Personally I really liked Dana's propos
onsive-business-site-template/full_screen_preview/2035034
> http://themeforest.net/item/doctype-claquette-responsive-video-html-template/full_screen_preview/2085780
> http://themeforest.net/item/valera-responsive-html-template/full_screen_preview/2194402
>
>
>
> However
> Fr
You already posted that earlier today Adnane.
--
Dana Woodman
d...@danawoodman.com (mailto:d...@danawoodman.com)
http://www.danawoodman.com
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Adnane Belmadiaf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to introduce myself, here is my proposal
> http:/
ly nice, I like it!
>
> 2012/4/29 Juan Pablo MartÃnez
> http://imgur.com/a/186fh
> nice :)
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Giovanni Collazo wrote:
> I liked what Dana Woodman did, so I did a design based on that.
>
> Here: http://imgur.com/a/186fh
>
> --
> @gc
Jeez, looks like I started a tsunami...
On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Adnane Belmadiaf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to introduce myself, here is my proposal
> http://i.imgur.com/bnf2e.png
>
> Best,
> Adnane Belmadiaf
>
> 2012/4/29 Dana Woodman
>
This is my take: http://cl.ly/0U2C1O20133i0U3d1s3X/o
--
Dana Woodman
d...@danawoodman.com (mailto:d...@danawoodman.com)
http://www.danawoodman.com
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Alec Taylor wrote:
> Here is a design I just pulled up: http://i.imgur.com/wIkel.png
>
> Thoughts
ach would be best or should it be a complete
overhaul in one go?
--
Dana Woodman
d...@danawoodman.com (mailto:d...@danawoodman.com)
http://www.danawoodman.com
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Hi Dana
>
>
> On Sunday, 29 April 2012 at 1:45 AM,
our hands dirty. I many ways I don't know if a redesign is
> going to happen without someone taking the initiative and getting it done, so
> it might as well be you! :)
>
> On Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:22:59 AM UTC-5, Dana Woodman wrote:
> So now that Django is being moved t
ently have!). I'd love to talk
scope and other factors so I have a clear idea of what would be involved.
Is this a good forum for this type of discussion or should we get in touch
elsewhere to talk? You can get in touch with me here: http://danawoodman.com/
--
Dana Woodman
d...@danawoodma
So now that Django is being moved to Git/Github (which is awesome!), maybe
it would be a good time to think about a revamped home page for the project
ala djangoproject.com?
Obviously this is no small undertaking and would be potentially contentions
as to what would be the proper path, but I fe
Congrats Adrian, this is very exciting news! I'm excited to see Django
taking the next leap forward, exciting times ahead! Cheers!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.goo
Wow this is awesome! Congrats on the change! Very excited to be able to
contribute a Pull Request or two!
On Friday, April 27, 2012 9:50:01 AM UTC-7, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>
> Hey guys, here's an important heads-up!
>
> We're going to do the migration to GitHub today. This means we'll no
> lon
12 matches
Mail list logo
