Re: Form customization

2019-10-06 Thread Confi Yobo
I kind of support what you are saying Alex Scott, I think the form should be simplified at currently it takes a lot of time to setup a simple contact form. My suggestion is that upon creation of every form there should be properties and methods to allows you to customize the form. Simplifying the

Re: Django Websocket Implementation Request

2019-08-10 Thread Confi Yobo
Ok On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 6:07 PM Carlton Gibson wrote: > > On 10 Aug 2019, at 18:51, Confi Yobo wrote: > > So it should not be expected in 3.0? @ Carlton Gibson > > > No. As per the previous comments, it’s not something likely to be included > in core. Certainly n

Re: Django Websocket Implementation Request

2019-08-10 Thread Confi Yobo
So it should not be expected in 3.0? @ Carlton Gibson On Thursday, August 1, 2019 at 2:09:21 PM UTC+1, Confi Yobo wrote: > > This might be a little redundant as you would say but i see importance in > it. > > Django should come chipped in with websocket implementation rather >

Re: retriving all table from database

2019-08-07 Thread Confi Yobo
Like Adam Johnson has said, i think you should use stackoverflow or any django facebook group for this post. On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 5:16 PM vishal singh wrote: > please anyone help me out its urgent.. > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 19:56, vishal singh > wrote: > >> can anyone help me to pull all tab

Re: Django Websocket Implementation Request

2019-08-01 Thread Confi Yobo
that will work for everyone. Having > "one right way to do it" is sort of a necessary prerequisite to having > something in Django, and I just don't feel like it's there. > > Andrew > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 6:00 AM Confi Yobo wrote: > >> And socket.io

Re: Django Websocket Implementation Request

2019-08-01 Thread Confi Yobo
And socket.io kind of implementation is one thing developers from js like us are missing in django. On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:58 PM Confi Yobo wrote: > Please consider it, cause the procedures of using third party websocket > library (mostly for production) is cumbersome > > On Thu,

Re: Django Websocket Implementation Request

2019-08-01 Thread Confi Yobo
ping it in the third-party > package.) > > I guess something to revisit after 3.0. > > Kind Regards, > > Carlton > > > On Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:09:21 UTC+2, Confi Yobo wrote: >> >> This might be a little redundant as you would say but i see importance i

Django Websocket Implementation Request

2019-08-01 Thread Confi Yobo
This might be a little redundant as you would say but i see importance in it. Django should come chipped in with websocket implementation rather developers using third party libraries like django-channels which are difficult and most at times have poor documentation. I have seen many cases where d

Framework support suggestion

2019-04-01 Thread Confi Yobo
Please, I want to suggest a feature for django to have an eject functionality just like laravel where a developer can use/change from one webjs framework to another. And would have a package.json attached to each project to ease development time. My reason is that django is one of the best web dev

Re: help regarding google summer of code

2019-03-18 Thread Confi Yobo
Sincerely, i really think django should have an integration for frontend frameworks just like laravel(which with just eject you have switched framework) or ruby. because the work around is really stressfull and sometimes hard to deploy. On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:48 PM Muhammad Faraz wrote: > > in