Let me get straight to the point, since I seem to suffer from chronic
"tl;dr" syndrome as of late.
1) I'm all for a re-thinking of the admin, and I agree that a
rethinking would be better placed with a 2.0-release because of the
aforementioned backwards-compatabilitiy issues. Baby steps are better
Also +1 to the idea of a conference site. I'm +0 on the prospect of
adding features like the ones on the Carsonified site for brevity's
sake. Definitely +1 to the prospect of seeing examples of unit testing
and caching. On a tangent, if there's any design work needed for said
site, I'll be happy t
On Aug 8, 9:51 am, Dave Jeffery wrote:
> Just a quick note that I would be happy to help out with this area of the
> docs too.
Same here. Should we create a wiki page to coordinate this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
+1 on trac milestones. I think it's important that people start to see
what will be done when and what features will get pushed off to 1.0.
Milestones, at least for me as a growing developer, have always
provided that extra motivation as the progress meter approaches 100%.
Just seems more organize
Indeed! Congrats! Now we need to get brosner to throw this into NFA so
us branchies can start playing with it as well. :)
On Apr 26, 11:30 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Massive congratulations and thanks all around, and to Malcolm!
>
> On Apr 27, 1:04 am, "Mike Scott" <[EMA
> What am I forgetting?
This is a completely personal and probably selfish desire, but I'd
love to see the comments system rewrite in there. It's been on that
informal wiki-list ever since I started using Django.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message beca
