>
> On the issue of what to call 1.0, I like Max Battcher's idea of
> adopting an Ubuntu-like date-based version. Puts some useful
> information (how old is it?) into the release name and avoids
> preconceived notions of stability/completeness associated with .0
> releases.
I'm +1 on that as
john-f wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm currently moving sites over to one server at my company. The
> server will be hosting 2 versions of django (0.91 and 0.95).
>
> Currently all the 0.91 sites on the server are up and running.
> However, after I set up my first 0.95 site on the server I'm getting a
> "
I have experience working remotely. I'm in southern USA.
Are you looking for fulltime or contract?
--B
sime wrote:
>I'm looking for a talented local programmer to help with a growing
>workload, on a regular contract basis. All projects in django :-)
>
>Or if you have experience working remotely
>This is exactly the sort of change I was thinking of (note that it took
>exactly two lines :-) ). Not sure if it covers all cases at the moment,
>but you're definitely on the right track.
>
>
heh yeah, I did notice it was two lines. And it probably does not handle
all the cases since I'm self
forwarding to dev list from -users, since it fits dev better
the original thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/fdc940db9fd9d7a0/4a966c68c0036854?lnk=raot
--B
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subsc
