On Jan 23, 7:05 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> A full explanation, including an example is in the documentation
> portion of the patch, attached to ticket #12542.
>
> Comments?
This fixed our only (known) blocking problem towards 1.2, thanks so
much.
Brett
--
You received this message becaus
On Jan 7, 7:33 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> then my understanding of your proposal is that the only change is that
> read-slave won't get created under the test setup. But doesn't that
> mean that::
>
> MyModel.objects.using('read-slave').filter(...)
>
> will fall over?
No, not in my ment
On Jan 5, 8:09 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> If you're actually doing master/slave in the wild, your guidance may
> actually be more enlightening than my theoretical navel gazing. In
> particular - how have you got master/slave configured? How do you find
> and select slave databases? How does
On Dec 22 2009, 4:27 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> I'll need to cogitate on this over my Christmas pudding :-)
Did you come to any conclusions, or need any more feedback on the read-
slave testing issue?
I in no way mean to rush, I just wanted to make sure I didn't (and
don't) miss anything a
On Dec 22, 4:27 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> * Allow TEST_NAME=None to mean "don't try and instantiate this
> database in test mode"
That sounds good, too.
> * Allow a top level TEST_DATABASES setting; TEST_DATABASES would
> override DATABASES; if TEST_DATABASES isn't defined, then TEST_N
On Dec 19, 6:48 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> You're right - read slaves are an intended common use case
I know the branch landed but I'd like to mention another issue
regarding read-slaves, hope that's OK. :)
Running tests against code that uses master and read-slaves (but
actually point at
On Dec 18, 9:50 am, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> I'm wondering if perhaps the most prudent thing to do would be to
> simply remove this check. The end result will be you'll get an
> integrity error on Postgres/Oracle when you try to save (and SQLite
> and MySQL will just let you do whatever).
That would
I'm not sure if 1.2 intended to fully support read-slaves, but I'll
post this quick anyway as we've just run into it while trying to
upgrade at DISQUS.
You might think that having support for multiple databases implies
that using a read-slave would Just Work, and that's mostly true.
There's one ed
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Nizam Sayeed wrote:
> Count me in and a friend of mine as well.
>
> On Apr 3, 12:33 pm, Preston Timmons wrote:
>> I would be interested in coming as well.
I assume you guys are OK with either weekend, then?
Brett
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:20 AM, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And it doesn't handle project-local installation (arguably this
> can be done with virtualenv, but that will just clutter user-specific
> "app-space" instead of the global one).
At some point the Django app you're trying to insta
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM, daonb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we want a roadmap, to better help with ticket triage. You can reply
> with -1 or 0 if you don't like the idea
I very much doubt anyone is against a roadmap.
Again, Djangocon _just_ started. Let me quote Jacob from this very
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:41 AM, daonb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob, please release a roadmap ASAP or let us know what version we
> should use for new tickets. It's important to have a roadmap (and I'm
> +1 for grasshoper's suggestion)
Er, Django 1.0 was only released _3 days_ ago. You kno
On 8/6/07, Emanuele Pucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's Ned Batchelder's coverage.py: http://nedbatchelder.com/code/
> modules/coverage.html . Haven't tried it myself, but I have to
> suppose that it's Django-friendly. :)
http://siddhi.blogspot.com/2007/04/code-coverage-for-your-djan
On 8/5/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Django handles both just fine, returns the same page for both.
Not on our live site. And I just made a fresh django-trunk project to
test it, didn't work there either. Although aren't resolvers just
normal Python REs, so you could possibly h
14 matches
Mail list logo
