Re: #25897 - managers defined on non-abstract base classes inherited by child classes

... some fields, still no manager > > Now, are you suggesting that Comment.objects must be defined explicitly? I > find > that odd. > > Shai. > > On Saturday 06 February 2016 18:07:22 Alex Poleha wrote: > > Thank you for the suggestion. Pull request is adjus

Re: #25897 - managers defined on non-abstract base classes inherited by child classes

warning for a couple releases? If > anyone is relying on the behavior, they just need to add the managers to > any subclasses, correct? > > On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 9:16:41 AM UTC-5, Alex Poleha wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> According to documentation >

#25897 - managers defined on non-abstract base classes inherited by child classes

Hi. According to documentation managers defined on non-abstract base classes are not inherited by child classes. In fact they're inherited via python MRO. I made pull request