Re: ticket 5929

Thank you Barhamou for raising the question here and starting the discussion. I agree with Adrian that this feels like a pretty niche use case. Depending on the needs, other possible implementations might include: 4. A form field mapping to multiple model fields 5. A custom queryset/manager that

Re: #21978 include production-ready web server

At Florian's suggestion in another thread, I propose that we move further discussion of the settings refactor to the forum: https://forum.djangoproject.com/t/settings-refactor/17352 On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 2:58:29 PM UTC-4 f.apo...@gmail.com wrote: > The speckenv example highlights t

Re: Integrate dj-database-url into Django

I started a forum thread on the settings refactor here: https://forum.djangoproject.com/t/settings-refactor/17352 Regarding the original topic of this thread ( https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28236), are we ready to close this as wontfix? I'm okay not proceeding with it (dj-database-url, dja

Re: Can we move the activity on this list to the Forum now?

As someone who only just joined the forum -- I'm +1: - The forum has seen great adoption from what I can tell (nearly half the number of posts as django-developers during the same time period, not bad given the mailing list's head start in subscribers). - It seems beneficial to house f

Re: Integrate dj-database-url into Django

Hi Carlton, Responses inline below: On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 2:40 AM Carlton Gibson wrote: > Hi Raphael, thanks for picking this up. > > Looking at the history here, particularly the discussion here > https://groups.google.com/g/django-developers/c/UQjpzB39JN0/m/XGqdV8nbBwAJ > but there are others

Re: Potential way forward for DATABASE_URL

Hi Raphael, Thanks for taking this on. Starting with a limited scope seems like a good idea to me. A couple other things I like about this approach: - It tackles cache URLs at the same time (it makes sense for them to mirror one another, IMO). - No implicit usage of DATABASE_URL, but as you sai

Re: #21978 include production-ready web server

Hi Pete, A pluggable backend sounds like a good idea. Regarding DJANGO_ENV, why not ship the template with two settings files and use the existing DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE, instead of adding a new environment variable? Maybe that would be controversial too, I'm not sure, but perhaps less so than i

Re: Proposal: Add An in-memory data storage backend in Django

Hi, I also may be missing some context, but is this the mentioned package? https://github.com/waveaccounting/dj-inmemorystorage I have not used it, but it looks like a useful tool to have! Tobias On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:50 PM David Sanders wrote: > Hi, > > I may be missing some context her

Re: Blocking disposable or temporary email addresses

Hi Yonas, Thanks for sharing this list. Even so, in my opinion, this feature lives best outside of Django where it can be appropriately customized as needed for a given project. I hope this helps. Best, Tobias On Wed, May 11, 2022, 6:46 PM Yonas wrote: > > Would syncing the block list from r

Re: Improvements to the startproject template

Tim, Thanks for taking this on! Needless to say, I'm all in favor of including a default 'users' app. Adding one (as has long been recommended by the docs) is a task best automated. I've definitely had the "no the other folder" conversation more than enough times myself. Personally I think I pre