Re: Add support for IDNA 2008

concrete cases... > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Carlton > > > > On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 08:18:13 UTC+2 Carlton Gibson wrote: > >> Hey Julien. >> >> Thanks, OK... 📖 >> >> The Python docs have it >> <https:

Re: Add support for IDNA 2008

) is the easiest way forward? > > Others may yet agree that this is something needed. > > Kind Regards, > > Carlton > > On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 20:23, 'Julien Bernard' via Django developers > (Contributions to Django itself) wrote: > >> Thanks Carlton.

Re: Add support for IDNA 2008

> whether that should be included in Django itself. (Taking on an extra > dependency for a small subset of users is always going to be up for debate > — it's not a blocker per se, but it does need weighing...) > > Kind Regards, > > Carlton > > On Fri, 2 Sept 2022

Re: Add support for IDNA 2008

st at this point: implement idna validators in a third party > package, do some advocacy for why projects would need it, and show some > adoption. This would make the case for Django itself stronger. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 4:18 PM 'Julien Bernard' via Django developers >

Add support for IDNA 2008

Hi, I'm starting this discussion following ticket #33968 recommendation in comment. Currently the punycode method is converting domain nam