Hey Tim!
> I'm of the opinion that if you care enough about Django to investigate
becoming a member of the DSF, that's enough of a qualification...
OK, so this is the point about whether or not we need another membership
level... — DSF membership has been "The DSF appoints individual Members in
r
I'm of the opinion that if you care enough about Django to investigate
becoming a member of the DSF, that's enough of a qualification - it is just
challenging to formalize that into proper text for the website. Maybe two
changes to encourage people to join:
- We could tweak *"Running Django-
Looking at the code Carlton provided sounds like it meets what was being
requested, but it fails "There should be one-- and preferably only one
--obvious way to do it." in that it wasn't immediately obvious, but adding
the cacheif tag would lead to more than one way. Therefore I'm suggesting
that e
Hey Andrew,
Thanks for drafting this language and I think it looks great. As someone
who only recently applied after hearing it discussed on an episode of
Django Chat[1], I'm all for the goals of making it more encouraging and
accessible and think this is a great step in that direction.
Here are
Suggested new language:
The following are Individual Members of the Django Software Foundation.
Individual Members are appointed by the DSF in recognition of their service
to the Django community.
Service to the Django community takes many forms. Here are some examples
(non-exhaustive) of cat
Week ending November 6, 2022
Released Django 4.1.3.
*Triaged:*
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34128 - django re-using the name
of a squashed migration leads to CircularDependencyError (invalid)
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34130 - order_by() has no effect
on values()/values_lis
