Hi Adrian,
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 5:13:14 PM UTC+1 ator...@redhat.com wrote:
> - Existing RemoteUserBackend implementations won't need to change
> signatures whenever backwards compatibility is removed
> - RemoteUserBackend implementations won't need to do anything in order to
> support
Hey Florian,
First of all, thank you for the feedback and I'm glad you agree that the
feature would be nice to have :)
I'm willing to implement whichever version people agree on since I do think
the feature will be useful, but I do think that having separate methods is
clearer, simpler, as well a
Hi Adrian,
I agree this would be nice to have.
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:03:09 PM UTC+1 ator...@redhat.com wrote:
> Another idea would be to use configure_user() for both initial
> configuration and synchronization by passing an extra parameter "created"
> to it, and calling it just before
