Thank you for diving into how unittest discovery tests!
On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 12:14:05 PM UTC+1 chris.j...@gmail.com wrote:
> But, regardless of the default, to get the full benefit I think you'd want
> at least one of the test runs in CI to be a random one.
>
This is were I somewhat dis
On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 10:47:56 AM UTC+1 Florian Apolloner wrote:
> Is the current order defined in any way -- if not one should consider it
> randoms anyways and as such actually randomizing should not make much of a
> difference. FWIW I am fine with making it the default and outputting the
Btw while I am fine with making it default (I really do not care much
either way), we certainly need a way to disable it and keep the current
algorithm (even though it might not be guaranteed stable). When I develop I
often run one suite and fix the errors as they occur. Having a stable order
t
Is the current order defined in any way -- if not one should consider it
randoms anyways and as such actually randomizing should not make much of a
difference. FWIW I am fine with making it the default and outputting the
seed at the end of the run so it can reproduced. I am curious if it finds
