Re: Struggling newbie

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:12 PM, wrote: > I am running python3.4 with Django in virtualenv. When I execute python > manage.py runserver I continue to get "sqlite3.NotSupportedError: URIs not > supported", I have looked all around for posts that will point me to the > solution but have not loca

Re: Struggling newbie

Could you provide you settings file? I think it may be an error in settings. > On 24 Aug 2016, at 23:12, jsjazzj...@gmail.com wrote: > > I am running python3.4 with Django in virtualenv. When I execute python > manage.py runserver I continue to get "sqlite3.NotSupportedError: URIs not > suppor

Struggling newbie

I am running python3.4 with Django in virtualenv. When I execute python manage.py runserver I continue to get "sqlite3.NotSupportedError: URIs not supported", I have looked all around for posts that will point me to the solution but have not located any to date. Can anyone provide me with clue

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

I've actually tried adding ThreadingMixIn to WSGIServer and it worked like a charm in my case. Here's the code I added: from django.test.testcases import LiveServerThread, QuietWSGIRequestHandler from django.core.servers.basehttp import WSGIServer from socketserver import ThreadingMixIn class T

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

In answer ti "Any idea how complex the patch would be?" in https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25970#comment:2 I think using socketserver.ThreadingMixin with django.core.servers.WSGIServer would do the job. Not completely sure about consequences though... вторник, 23 августа 2016 г., 19:59:40

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

Wow, that was a quick response! Tim, is there a way for me to join the discussion? Is there another mail thread? > On 24 Aug 2016, at 21:36, Tim Graham wrote: > > multithreading support has been proposed a couple times but it hasn't passed > the discussion stage yet. > > https://code.djangopro

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

I found this ticket about same issue: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20238 It was closed 2 years ago and one of the reasons is that use case was considered "somewhat fictional". I personally think my case is very real :) I'm thinking about us

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

multithreading support has been proposed a couple times but it hasn't passed the discussion stage yet. https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20238 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25970 On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 2:21:07 PM UTC-4, roboslone wrote: > > So I've tried LiveServerTestCase

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

So I've tried LiveServerTestCase and it seems that live server is single-threaded. If client timeout is 5 seconds, then LiveServerTestCase works fine for slow requests, that take from 1 to 9 seconds to process. Second try will send request to the same thread and client will get TimeoutError ins

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

I didn't try LiveServerTestCase yet (and to be honest never heard of it before), I'll give it a try. Thanks! > On 24 Aug 2016, at 17:19, Shai Berger wrote: > > Yes, the prototype I mentioned is a PR against Django, except that if it is > intended to clarify the request rather than supply it,

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

Yes, the prototype I mentioned is a PR against Django, except that if it is intended to clarify the request rather than supply it, it doesn't have to be full -- e.g. it doesn't need tests or documentation untill we decide we want the feature in. But before you go there -- isn't LiveServerTestCa

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

"Players" are backends (Django) and load balancer that proxies all user requests on one of the backends. In my case load balancer has small backend timeout (default is 3 sec, preferable is 1 sec) and it will send the same request (with the same X-Request-Id header) to another backend after this

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

On Wednesday 24 August 2016 14:33:34 Александр Христюхин wrote: > Actually network is not an issue here. I'm using locks in distributed cache > to manage requests between backends and that's what I want to test. In this > case calling Django directly is okay. > I am sorry, then; it seems I have m

Re: Simulating timeouts on client with django.test.client.Client

Actually network is not an issue here. I'm using locks in distributed cache to manage requests between backends and that's what I want to test. In this case calling Django directly is okay. вторник, 23 августа 2016 г., 23:16:10 UTC+3 пользователь Shai Berger написал: > > Hi, > > Just to make i