Thanks for the response, Tim.
On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 8:04:02 AM UTC+8, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> Hi Connor,
>
> Unfortunately we didn't have anyone sufficiently intrigued by your ideas
> who wanted to mentor it. In case you'd like to try again next year, I'd
> suggest to get involved in the
Hi Connor,
Unfortunately we didn't have anyone sufficiently intrigued by your ideas
who wanted to mentor it. In case you'd like to try again next year, I'd
suggest to get involved in the project and start submitting patches as
you're able. Mentors are more wiling to invest their time to help so
Hello all,
Is there any chance I could get some feedback on why this was not accepted?
I am a little surprised since Jacob Kaplan-Moss seemed to indicate to me
over IRC that this was very likely to get an award for GSoC.
Thanks,
Connor
On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 12:47:52 AM UTC+8, Connor Boy
Le vendredi 22 avril 2016 14:25:59 UTC+2, Claude Paroz a écrit :
>
> I'll see if I can find the time to work on something acceptable, allowing
> people to choose either policy without too much hassle and backwards
> incompatibility. Of course, anyone else could try it, too.
>
Here's some code,
Le jeudi 21 avril 2016 21:23:16 UTC+2, Aymeric Augustin a écrit :
>
> For what it’s worth, I’m in favor of restoring the intended behavior of
> restricting usernames to ASCII on Python 3 and letting developers who want
> something more elaborate implement their own requirements.
>
I'm sorry to d
Hello,
I would like to try to work on the #26481 ticket, and I'm new to the inner
workings of Django, but I thinks it's the best way to learn more about it.
Several enhancements / modifications are related to this ticket :
* The first one is adding a strict argument to only() that will raise an
