Re: structural & functional review of django documentation

Hi Scot -- Search terms would be another really great source of information. collecting these and somehow relating them to user's ensuing journey through the documentation could be very helpful. thanks, On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 2:45:56 AM UTC-5, Scot Hacker wrote: > > The written quality

Re: Request for Input: WSGI 2.0

Hi Cory, I'll reply on the Web-SIG mailing list too, but as I've outlined elsewhere, I don't think ASGI would be a suitable replacement for WSGI in the current form; in particular, I suspect it will have a performance disadvantage, though I've not quantified yet. That said, if Django Channels doe

Re: Request for Input: WSGI 2.0

Hi Cory, [Disclaimer - I don't suppose to speak for the whole community here, this is a personal opinion of how I see things] Django's wsgi handling code has remained largely unchanged for many years, so to answer the question of "what does Django itself need from new wsgi, ignoring channels", I'

Re: Docs and search : Split the results by category

A similar thing was proposed in another thread: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/QW06ctKbFKA/Yg-zE3RSEQAJ I don't disagree that the search could be better, so feel free to prototype something to get feedback. On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 10:25:54 AM UTC-5, Joachim Jablon wrote

Docs and search : Split the results by category

Hello, (not sure the question should be asked there or as a ticket of djangoproject.com) Seing this answer by Daniele Procida explaining how docs are organized made me realize that often, when searching for so

Request for Input: WSGI 2.0

All, An effort has begun over in the PSF Web-SIG special interest group to come up with a new version of the WSGI specification. The goal is to develop a successor to WSGI that will be more useful in the development of modern

Re: URL dispatching framework: feedback requested

On 4 janv. 2016, at 13:24, Tim Graham wrote: > It looks to me like the rationale for the existing organization is that > everything in that module is designed to be used in a URLconf. I believe it is. However, as I said on the pull request, most users won’t reverse engineer this subtlety. I th

Re: URL dispatching framework: feedback requested

It looks to me like the rationale for the existing organization is that everything in that module is designed to be used in a URLconf. Do you propose to make everything importable from "django.urls" or from "django.urls.conf" or some other organization? If we remove urls from django.conf, then

Re: Help needed with the MySQL max index length problem for Django 1.10

This has always been an error on MySQL afaik, it would allow broken data integrity if it were just a warning. Moving the length below 191 does seem to be the safest fix. On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at 1:52:27 PM UTC, Collin Anderson wrote: > > I think mysql used to just give a warning and ma