Hi!
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> Unless I missed something, channels aren’t about websockets. They add
> asynchronous processing capabilities to Django. They aim at being compatible
> with any bidirectional protocol.
Yes, but currently, that "bidirectional protoco
Triaged
---
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25885 - SyntaxError in Django 1.9
install output (invalid)
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25883 - Admin Delete Page Incorrectly
Counts Related Objects (accepted)
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25880 - Forms created by
form
Hello,
Unless I missed something, channels aren’t about websockets. They add
asynchronous processing capabilities to Django. They aim at being compatible
with any bidirectional protocol.
Django should support common protocols out of the box and document a public API
for third-party projects to
Hi!
This is really awesome news! Can I suggest to use WebRTC data channel
instead of Websockets?
I think we should make a paradigm shift and move to use WebRTC instead
of Websockets. This allows many interesting properties:
* connections can be based on SCTP
* have multi-path routing
* you can ha
great!!!
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Asif Saifuddin wrote:
> Awesome awesome !!! awesome!!! :D :D
>
> On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 12:19:00 AM UTC+6, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> For those who haven't seen, Mozilla has awarded $150,000 to Django for
>> work on Ch
Hi,
Just saying congrats to people involved and the community. Great step for
Django!
El viernes, 11 de diciembre de 2015, 19:19:00 (UTC+1), Andrew Godwin
escribió:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> For those who haven't seen, Mozilla has awarded $150,000 to Django for
> work on Channels and request/respons
