Making the admin compatible with CSP

2015-09-13 Thread James Bligh
Ticket #15727, dealing with adding support for the Content Security Policy header, was last updated with the suggestion that the one thing should be done is to make the admin site compatible by removing inline scripts. I'd love to see this done, especially with the new design. I have done a simila

Re: Concerns with new "libraries" template functionality

2015-09-13 Thread Aymeric Augustin
Hello, The situation is nowhere near as complicated as you make it sound. 1) Builtins: many applications or projects relied on the private `add_to_builtins` API in order not to have to {% load %} commonly used libraries in every template. The new “builtins” option provides a public API for thi

Re: Ability to migrate other applications

2015-09-13 Thread Shai Berger
Hi, On Thursday 10 September 2015 17:00:07 Emmanuelle Delescolle wrote: > As this thread is most likely leading to a dead-end, let me try to close it > by summarizing it: Not trying to re-open the thread, just that... > > Shai: This seemed a little far from what I said (or, at least, intended)

Re: Concerns with new "libraries" template functionality

2015-09-13 Thread Yo-Yo Ma
CORRECTION: | Due to #2, you can still run... Should be: | Due to #1, you can still run... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it

Concerns with new "libraries" template functionality

2015-09-13 Thread Yo-Yo Ma
I was reading through the 1.9 release notes when I came across the new OPTIONS['libraries'] feature. Relevant links: - https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.9/#template-tag-modules-are-imported-when-templates-are-configured - https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.9/#te

Re: Improving MSSQL and Azure SQL support on Django

2015-09-13 Thread Aymeric Augustin
Hi Tim, Thanks for sharing your experience! > On 13 sept. 2015, at 01:48, Tim Allen wrote: > We have a test suite performing table creates / destroys, basic CRUD > operations, stored procedure execution, and more against both pyodbc and > pymssql. > pymssql outperforms pyodbc significantly aga